ut in another way, and that dogmatically, antiquity exercised perilous
influence. It imparted to the Renaissance its own forms of
superstition. Some fragments of this had survived in Italy all through
the Middle Ages, and the resuscitation of the whole was thereby made so
much the more easy. The part played by the imagination in the process
need not be dwelt upon. This only could have silenced the critical
intellect of the Italians.
The belief in a Divine government of the world was in many minds
destroyed by the spectacle of so much injustice and misery. Others,
like Dante, surrendered at all events this life to the caprices of
chance, and if they nevertheless retained a sturdy faith, it was
because they held that the higher destiny of man would be accomplished
in the life to come. But when the belief in immortality began to waver,
then Fatalism got the upper hand, or sometimes the latter came first
and had the former as its consequence.
The gap thus opened was in the first place filled by the astrology of
antiquity, or even of the Arabs. From the relation of the planets among
themselves and to the signs of the zodiac. future events and the course
of whole lives were inferred, and the most weighty decisions were taken
in consequence. In many cases the line of action thus adopted at the
suggestion of the stars may not have been more immoral than that which
would otherwise have been followed. But too often the decision must
have been made at the cost of honour and conscience. It is profoundly
instructive to observe how powerless culture and enlightenment were
against this delusion; since the latter had its support in the ardent
imagination of the people, in the passionate wish to penetrate and
determine the future. Antiquity, too, was on the side of astrology.
At the beginning of the thirteenth century this superstition suddenly
appeared in the foreground of Italian life. The Emperor Frederick II
always travelled with his astrologer Theodorus; and Ezzelino da Romano
with a large, well-paid court of such people, among them the famous
Guido Bonatto and the long-bearded Saracen, Paul of Baghdad. In all
important undertakings they fixed for him the day and the hour, and the
gigantic atrocities of which he was guilty may have been in part
practical inferences from their prophecies. Soon all scruples about
consulting the stars ceased. Not only princes, but free cities, had
their regular astrologers, and at the universities, from the fourteenth
to the sixteenth century, professors of this pseudo-science were
appointed, and lectured side by side with the astronomers. The Popes
commonly made no secret of their stargazing, though Pius II, who also
despised magic, omens, and the interpretation of dreams, is an
honorable exception. Even Leo X seems to have thought the flourishing
condition of astrology a credit to his pontificate, and Paul III never
held a Consistory till the stargazers had fixed the hour.
It may fairly be assumed that the better natures did not allow their
actions to be determined by the stars beyond a certain point, and that
there was a limit where conscience and religion made them pause. In
fact, not only did pious and excellent people share the delusion, but
they actually came forward to profess it publicly. One of these was
Maestro Pagolo of Florence, in whom we can detect the same desire to
bring astrology to moral account which meets us in the late Roman
Firmicus Maternus. His life was that of a saintly ascetic. He ate
almost nothing, despised all temporal goods, and only collected books.
A skilled physician, he only practiced among his friends, and made it a
condition of his treatment that they should confess their sins. He
frequented the small but famous circle which assembled in the Monastery
of the Angeli around Fra Ambrogio Camaldolese. He also saw much of
Cosimo the Elder, especially in his last years; for Cosimo accepted and
used astrology, though probably only for objects of lesser importance.
As a rule, however, Pagolo only interpreted the stars to his most
confidential friends. But even without this severity of morals, the
astrologers might be highly respected and show themselves everywhere.
There were also far more of them in Italy than in other European
countries, where they only appeared at the great courts, and there not
always. All the great householders in Italy, when the fashion was once
established, kept an astrologer, who, it must be added, was not always
sure of his dinner. Through the literature of this science, which was
widely diffused even before the invention of printing, a dilettantism
also grew up which as far as possible followed in the steps of the
masters. The worst class of astrologers were those who used the stars
either as an aid or a cloak to magical arts.
Yet apart from the latter, astrology is a miserable feature in the life
of that time. What a figure do all these highly gifted, many-sided,
original characters play, when the blind passion for knowing and
determining the future dethrones their powerful will and resolution!
Now and then, when the stars send them too cruel a message, they manage
to brace themselves up, act for themselves, and say boldly: 'Vir
sapiens dominabitus lustris', the wise man is master of the stars--and
then again relapse into the old delusion.
In all the better families the horoscope of the children was drawn as a
matter of course, and it sometimes happened that for half a lifetime
men were haunted by the idle expectation of events which never
occurred! The stars were questioned whenever a great man had to come to
any important decision, and even consulted as to the hour at which any
undertaking was to be begun. The journeys of princes, the reception of
foreign ambassadors, the laying of the foundation-stones of public
buildings, depended on the answer. A striking instance of the latter
occurs in the life of the aforenamed Guido Bonatto, who by his personal
activity and by his great systematic work on the subject deserves to be
called the restorer of astrology in the thirteenth century. In order to
put an end to the struggle of the Guelphs and Ghibellines at Forli, he
persuaded the inhabitants to rebuild the city walls and to begin the
works under a constellation indicated by himself. If then two men, one
from each party, at the same moment put a stone into the foundation,
there would henceforth and for ever be no more party divisions in
Forli. A Guelph and a Ghibelline were selected for this office; the
solemn moment arrived, each held the stone in his hands, the workmen
stood ready with their implements. Bonatto gave the signal, and the
Ghibelline threw down his stone on to the foundation. But the Guelph
hesitated, and at last refused to do anything at all, on the ground
that Bonatto himself had the reputation of a Ghibelline and might be
devising some mysterious mischief against the Guelphs. Upon which the
astrologer addressed him: 'God damn thee and the Guelph party with your
distrustful malice! This constellation will not appear above our city
for 500 years to come.' In fact God soon afterwards did destroy the
Guelphs of Forli, but now, writes the chronicler about 1480, the two
parties are thoroughly reconciled, and their very names are heard no
longer.
Nothing that depended upon the stars was more important than decisions
in time of war. The same Bonatto procured for the great Ghibelline
leader Guido da Montefeltro a series of victories, by telling him the
propitious hour for marching. When Montefeltro was no longer
accompanied by him he lost the courage to maintain his despotism, and
entered a Minorite monastery, where he lived as a monk for many years
till his death. In the war with Pisa in 1362, the Florentines
commissioned their astrologer to fix the hour for the march, and almost
came too late through suddenly receiving orders to take a circuitous
route through the city. On former occasions they had marched out by the
Via di Borgo Santi Apostoli, and the campaign had been unsuccessful. It
was clear that there was some bad omen connected with the exit through
this street against Pisa, and consequently the army was now led out by
the Porta Rossa. But as the tents stretched out there to dry had not
been taken away, the flags--another bad omen--had to be lowered. The
influence of astrology in war was confirmed by the fact that nearly all
the Condottieri believed in it. Jacopo Caldora was cheerful in the most
serious illness, knowing that he was fated to fall in battle, which in
fact happened. Bartolommeo Alviano was convinced that his wounds in the
head were as much a gift of the stars as his military command. Niccolo
Orsini-Pitigliano asked the physicist and astrologer Alessandro
Benedetto to fix a favourable hour for the conclusion of his bargain
with Venice. When the Florentines on June 1, 1498, solemnly invested
their new Condottiere Paolo Vitelli with his office, the Marshal's
staff which they handed him was, at his own wish, decorated with
pictures of the constellations.
Sometimes it is not easy to make out whether }n important political
events the stars were questioned beforehand, or whether the astrologers
were simply impelled afterwards by curiosity to find out the
constellation which decided the result. When Giangaleazzo Visconti by a
master-stroke of policy took prisoner his uncle Bernabo, with the
latter's family (1385), we are told by a contemporary that Jupiter,
Saturn and Mars stood in the house of the Twins, but we cannot say if
the deed was resolved on in consequence. It is also probable that the
advice of the astrologers was often determined by political calculation
not less than by the course of the planets.
All Europe, through the latter part of the Middle Ages, had allowed
itself to be terrified by predictions of plagues, wars, floods, and
earthquakes, and in this respect Italy was by no means behind other
countries. The unlucky year 1494, which for ever opened the gates of
Italy to the stranger, was undeniably ushered in by many prophecies of
misfortune--only we cannot say whether such prophecies were not ready
for each and every year.
This mode of thought was extended with thorough consistency into
regions where we should hardly expect to meet with it. If the whole
outward and spiritual life of the individual is determined by the facts
of his birth, the same law also governs groups of individuals and
historical products --that is to say, nations and religions; and as the
constellation of these things changes, so do the things themselves. The
idea that each religion has its day, first came into Italian culture in
connection with these astrological beliefs. The conjunction of Jupiter
with Saturn brought forth, we are told, the faith of Israel; that of
Jupiter and Mars, the Chaldean; with the Sun, the Egyptian; with Venus,
the Mohammedan; with Mercury, the Christian; and the conjunction of
Jupiter with the Moon will one day bring forth the religion of
Antichrist. Cecco d'Ascoli had already blasphemously calculated the
nativity of Christ, and deduced from it his death upon the Cross. For
this he was burnt at the stake in 1327, at Florence. Doctrines of this
sort ended by simply darkening men's whole perceptions of spiritual
things.
So much more worthy then of recognition is the warfare which the clear
Italian spirit waged against this army of delusions. Notwithstanding
the great monumental glorification of astrology, as in the frescoes in
the Salone at Padua, and those in Borso's summer palace (Schifanoia) at
Ferrara, notwithstanding the shameless praises of even such a man as
the elder Beroaldus, there was no want of thoughtful and independent
minds to protest against it. Here, too, the way had been prepared by
antiquity, but it was their own common sense and observation which
taught them what to say. Petrarch's attitude towards the astrologers,
whom he knew by personal intercourse, is one of bitter contempt; and no
one saw through their system of lies more clearly than he. The novels,
from the time when they first began to appear from the time of the
'Cento novelle antiche,' are almost always hostile to the astrologers.
The Florentine chroniclers bravely keep themselves free from the
delusions which, as part of historical tradition, they are compelled to
record. Giovanni Villani says more than once, 'No constellation can
subjugate either the free will of man, or the counsels of God.' Matteo
Villani declares astrology to be a vice which the Florentines had
inherited, along with other superstitions, from their pagan ancestors,
the Romans. The question, however, did not remain one for mere literary
discussion, but the parties for and against disputed publicly. After
the terrible floods of 1333, and again in 1345, astrologers and
theologians discussed with great minuteness the influence of the stars,
the will of God, and the justice of his punishments. These struggles
never ceased throughout the whole time of the Renaissance, and we may
conclude that the protestors were ill earnest, since it was easier for
them to recommend themselves to the great by defending, than by
opposing astrology.
In the circle of Lorenzo the Magnificent, among his most distinguished
Platonists, opinions were divided on this question. Marsilio Ficino
defended astrology, and drew the horoscope of the children of the
house, promising the little Giovanni, afterwards Leo X, that he would
one day be Pope. Pico della Mirandola, on the other hand, made an epoch
in the subject by his famous refutation. He detects in this belief the
root of all impiety and immorality. If the astrologer, he maintains,
believes in anything at all, he must worship not God, but the planets,
from which all good and evil are derived. All other superstitions find
a ready instrument in astrology, which serves as handmaid to geomancy,
chiromancy, and magic of every kind. As to morality, he maintains that
nothing can more foster evil than the opinion that heaven itself is the
cause of it, in which case the faith in eternal happiness and
punishment must also disappear. Pico even took the trouble to check off
the astrologers inductively, and found that in the course of a month
three-fourths of their weather prophecies turned out false. But his
main achievement was to set forth, in the Fourth Book, a positive
Christian doctrine of the freedom of the will and the government of the
universe, which seems to have made a greater impression on the educated
classes throughout Italy than all the revivalist preachers put
together. The latter, in fact, often failed to reach these classes.
The first result of his book was that the astrologers ceased to publish
their doctrines, and those who had already printed them were more or
less ashamed of what they had done. Gioviano Pontano, for example, in
his book on Fate, had recognized the science, and in a great work of
his had expounded the whole theory of it in the style of the old
Firmicus, ascribing to the stars the growth of every bodily and
spiritual quality. He now in his dialogue 'Aegidius' surrendered, if
not astrology, at least certain astrologers) and sounded the praises of
free will, by which man is enabled to know God. Astrology remained more
or less in fashion, but seems not to have governed human life in the
way it formerly had done. The art of painting, which in the fifteenth
century had done its best to foster the delusion now expressed the
altered tone of thought. Raphael, in the cupola of the Capella Chigi,
represents the gods of the different planets and the starry firmament,
watched, however, and guided by beautiful angel-figures, and receiving
from above the blessing of the eternal Father. There was also another
cause which now began to tell against astrology in Italy. The Spaniards
took no interest in it, not even the generals, and those who wished to
gain their favour declared open war against the half-heretical,
half-Mohammedan science. It is true that Guicciardini writes in the year
1529: 'How happy are the astrologers, who are believed if they tell one
truth to a hundred lies, while other people lose all credit if they
tell one lie to a hundred truths.' But the contempt for astrology did
not necessarily lead to a return to the belief in Providence. It could
as easily lead to an indefinite fatalism.
In this respect, as in others, Italy was unable to make its own way
healthily through the ferment of the Renaissance, because the foreign
invasion and the Counter-Reformation came upon it in the middle.
Without such interfering causes its own strength would have enabled it
thoroughly to get rid of these fantastic illusions. Those who hold that
the onslaught of the strangers and the Catholic reactions were
necessities for which the Italian people was itself solely responsible,
will look on the spiritual bankruptcy which they produced as a just
retribution. But it is a pity that the rest of Europe had indirectly to
pay so large a part of the penalty.
The belief in omens seems a much more innocent matter than astrology.
The Middle Ages had everywhere inherited them in abundance from the
various pagan religions; and Italy did not differ in this respect from
other countries. What is characteristic of Italy is the support lent by
humanism to the popular superstition. The pagan inheritance was here
backed up by a pagan literary development.
The popular superstition of the Italians rested largely on premonitions
and inferences drawn from ominous occurrences. with which a good deal
of magic, mostly of an innocent sort, was connected. There was,
however. no lack of learned humanists who boldly ridiculed these
delusions, and to whose attacks we partly owe the knowledge of them.
Gioviano Pontano, the author of the great astrological work already
mentioned above, enumerates with pity in his 'Charon' a long string of
Neapolitan superstitions--the grief of the women when a fowl or goose
caught the pip; the deep anxiety of the nobility if a hunting falcon
did not come home, or if a horse sprained its foot; the magical
formulae of the Apulian peasants, recited on three Saturday evenings,
when mad dogs were at large. The animal kingdom, as in antiquity, was
regarded as specially significant in this respect, and the behavior of
the lions, leopards, and other beasts kept by the State gave the people
all the more food for reflection, because they had come to be
considered as living symbols of the State. During the siege of
Florence, in 1597 an eagle which had been shot at fled into the city,
and the Signoria gave the bearer four ducats because the omen was good.
Certain times and places were favourable or unfavorable, or even
decisive one way or the other, for certain actions. The Florentines, so
Varchi tells us, held Saturday to be the fateful day on which all
important events, good as well as bad, commonly happened. Their
prejudice against marching out to war through a particular street has
been already mentioned. At Perugia one of the gates, the 'Porta
Eburnea,' was thought lucky, and the Baglioni always went out to fight
through it. Meteors and the appearance of the heavens were as
significant in Italy as elsewhere in the Middle Ages, and the popular
imagination saw warring armies in an unusual formation of clouds, and
heard the clash of their collision high in the air. The superstition
became a more serious matter when it attached itself to sacred things,
when figures of the Virgin wept or moved the eyes, or when public
calamities were associated with some alleged act of impiety, for which
the people demanded expiation. In 1478, when Piacenza was visited
with a violent and prolonged rainfall, it was said that there would be
no dry weather till a certain usurer, who had been lately buried in San
Francesco, had ceased to rest in consecrated earth. As the bishop was
not obliging enough to have the corpse dug up the young fellows of the
town took it by force, dragged it down the streets amid frightful
confusion, and at last threw it into the Po. Even Politian accepted
this point of view in speaking of Giacomo Pazzi, one of the chiefs of
the conspiracy of 1478, In Florence, which is called after his family.
When he was put to death, he devoted his soul to Satan with fearful
words; here, too, rain followed and threatened to ruin the harvest;
here, too, a party of men, mostly peasants, dug up the body in the
church, and immediately the clouds departed and the sun shone--'so
gracious was fortune to the opinion of the people,' adds the great
scholar. The corpse was first cast into unhallowed ground, the next day
dug up, and after a horrible procession through the city thrown into
the Arno.
These facts and the like bear a popular character, and might have
occurred in the tenth, just as well as in the sixteenth century. But
now comes the literary influence of antiquity. We know positively that
the humanists were peculiarly accessible to prodigies and auguries, and
instances of this have been already quoted. If further evidence were
needed, it would be found in Poggio. The same radical thinker who
denied the rights of noble birth and the inequality of men, not only
believed in all the mediaeval stories of ghosts and devils, but also in
prodigies after the ancient pattern, like those said to have occurred
on the last visit of Pope Eugenius IV to Florence. 'Near Como there
were seen one evening four thousand dogs, who took the road to Germany;
these were followed by a great herd of cattle, and these by an army on
foot and horseback, some with no heads and some with almost invisible
heads, and then a gigantic horseman with another herd of cattle behind
him.' Poggio also believes in a battle of magpies and jackdaws. He even
relates, perhaps without being aware of it, a well-preserved piece of
ancient mythology. On the Dalmatian coast a Triton had appeared,
bearded and horned, a genuine sea-satyr, ending in fins and a tail; he
carried away women and children from the shore, till five stout-hearted
washerwomen killed him with sticks and stones. A wooden model of the
monster, which was exhibited at Ferrara, makes the whole story credible
to Poggio. Though there were no more oracles, and it was no longer
possible to take counsel of the gods, yet it became again the fashion
to open Virgil at hazard, and take the passage hit upon as an omen
('Sorted Virgilianae'). Nor can the belief in daemons current in the
later period of antiquity have been without influence on the
Renaissance. The work of Iamblichus or Abarnmon on the Mysteries of the
Egyptians, which may have contributed to this result, was printed in a
Latin translation at the end of the fifteenth century. The Platonic
Academy at Florence was not free from these and other neoplatonic
delusions of the Roman decadence. A 'few words must here be given to
the belief in demons and to the magic which was connected with this
belief.
The popular faith in what is called the spirit-world was nearly the
same in Italy as elsewhere in Europe. In Italy as elsewhere there were
ghosts, that is, reappearances of deceased persons; and if the view
taken of them differed in any respect from that which prevailed in the
North, the difference betrayed itself only in the ancient name 'ombra.'
Even nowadays if such a shade presents itself, a couple of Masses are
said for its repose. That the spirits of bad men appear in a dreadful
shape, is a matter of course, but along with this we find the notion
that the ghosts of the departed are universally malicious. The dead,
says the priest in a novel of Bandello, kill the little children. It
seems as if a certain shade was here thought of as separate from the
soul, since the latter suffers in Purgatory, and when it appears, does
nothing but wail and pray. At other times what appears is not the ghost
of a man, but of an event - -of a past condition of things. So the
neighbors explained the diabolical appearances in the old palace of the
Visconti near San Giovanni in Conca, at Milan, since here it was that
Bernab
Visconti had caused countless victims of his tyranny to be
tortured and strangled, and no wonder if there were strange things to
be seen. One evening a swarm of poor people with candles in their hands
appeared to a dishonest guardian of the poor at Perugia, and danced
round about him; a great figure spoke in threatening tones on their
behalf, it was St. Alo, the patron saint of the poorhouse. These modes
of belief were so much a matter of course that the poets could make use
of them as something which every reader would understand. The
appearance of the slain Lodovico Pico under the walls of the besieged
Mirandola is finely represented by Castiglione. It is true that poetry
made the freest use of these conceptions when the poet himself had
outgrown them.
Italy, too, shared the belief in demons with the other nations of the
Middle Ages. Men were convinced that God sometimes allowed bad spirits
of every class to exercise a destructive influence on parts of the
world and of human life. The only reservation made was that the man to
whom the Evil One came as tempter, could use his free will to resist.
In Italy the demonic influence, especially as shown in natural events,
easily assumed a character of poetical greatness. In the night before
the great inundation of the Val d'Arno in 1333, a pious hermit above
Vallombrosa heard a diabolical tumult in his cell, crossed himself,
stepped to the door, and saw a crowd of black and terrible knights
gallop by in amour. When conjured to stand, one of them said: 'We go to
drown the city of Florence on account of its sins, if God will let us.'
With this, the nearly contemporary vision at Venice (1340) may be
compared, out of which a great master of the Venetian school, probably
Giorgione, made the marvelous picture of a galley full of daemons,
which speeds with the swiftness of a bird over the stormy lagoon to
destroy the sinful island-city, till the three saintS, who have stepped
unobserved into a poor boatman's skiff, exorcised the fiends and sent
them and their vessel to the bottom of the waters.
To this belief the illusion was now added that by means of magical arts
it was possible to enter into relations with the evil ones, and use
their help to further the purposes of greed, ambition, and sensuality.
Many persons were probably accused of doing so before the time when it
was actually attempted by many; but when the so-called magicians and
witches began to be burned, the deliberate practice of the black art
became more frequent. With the smoke of the fires in which the
suspected victims were sacrificed, were spread the narcotic fumes by
which numbers of ruined characters were drugged into magic; and with
them many calculating impostors became associated.
The primitive and popular form in which the superstition had probably
lived on uninterruptedly from the time of the Romans, was the art of
the witch(strege).The witch, so long as she limited herself to mere
divination, might be innocent enough. were it not that the transition
from prophecy to active help could easily, though often imperceptibly,
be a fatal downward step. She was credited in such a case not only with
the power of exciting love or hatred between man and woman, but also
with purely destructive and malignant arts, and was especially charged
with the sickness of little children, even when the malady obviously
came from the neglect and stupidity of the parents. It is still
questionable how far she was supposed to act by mere magical ceremonies
and formula, or by a conscious alliance with the fiends, apart from the
poisons and drugs which she administered with a full knowledge of their
effect.
The more innocent form of the superstition, in which the mendicant
friar could venture to appear as the competitor of the witch, is shown
in the case of the witch of Gaeta whom we read of in Pontano. His
traveller Suppatius reaches her dwelling while she is giving audience
to a girl and a servingmaid, who come to her with a black hen, nine
eggs laid on a Friday, a duck, and some white thread, for it is the
third day since the new moon. They are then sent away, and bidden to
come again at twilight. It is to be hoped that nothing worse than
divination is intended. The mistress of the servant-maid is pregnant by
a monk; the girl's lover has proved untrue and has gone into a
monastery. The witch complains: 'Since my husband's death I support
myself in this way, and should make a good thing of it, since the
Gaetan women have plenty of faith, were it not that the monks balk me
of my gains by explaining dreams, appeasing the anger of the saints for
money, promising husbands to the girls, men-children to the pregnant
women, offspring to the barren, and besides all this visiting the women
at night when their husbands are away fishing, in accordance with the
assignations made in daytime at church.' Suppatius warns her against
the envy of the monastery, but she has no fear, since the guardian of
it is an old acquaintance of hers.
But the superstition further gave rise to a worse sort of witches,
namely those who deprived men of their health and life. In these cases
the mischief, when not sufficiently accounted for by the evil eye and
the like, was naturally attributed to the aid of powerful spirits. The
punishment, as we have seen in the case of Finicella, was the stake;
and yet a compromise with fanaticism was sometimes practicable.
According to the laws of Perugia, for example, a witch could settle the
affair by paying down 400 pounds. The matter was not then treated with
the seriousness and consistency of later times. In the territories of
the Church? at Norcia (Nursia), the home of St. Benedict in the upper
Apennines, there was a perfect nest of witches and sorcerers, and no
secret was made of it. It is spoken of in one of the most remarkable
letters of Aeneas Sylvius, belonging to his earlier period. He writes
to his brother: 'The bearer of this came to me to ask if I knew of a
Mount of Venus in Italy, for in such a place magical arts were taught,
and his master, a Saxon and a great astronomer, was anxious to learn
them. I told him that I knew of a Porto Venere not far from Carrara, on
the rocky coast of Liguria, where I spent three nights on the way to
Basle; I also found that there was a mountain called Eryx, in Sicily,
which was dedicated to Venus, but I did not know whether magic was
taught here. But it came into my mind while talking, that in Umbria, in
the old Duchy (Spoleto)? near the town of Nursia, there is a cave
beneath a steep rock, in which water flows. There, as I remember to
have heard, are witches (striges), demons, and nightly shades, and he
that has the courage can see and speak to ghosts (spiritus), and learn
magical arts. I have not seen it, nor taken any trouble about it, for
that which is learned with sin is better not learned at all.' He
nevertheless names his informant, and begs his brother to take the
bearer of the letter to him, should he be still alive. Aeneas goes far
enough here in his politeness to a man of position, but personally he
was not only freer from superstition than his contemporaries, but he
also stood a test on the subject which not every educated man of our
own day could endure. At the time of the Council of Basle, when he lay
sick of the fever for seventy-five days at Milan, he could never be
persuaded to listen to the magic doctors, though a man was brought to
his bedside who a short time before had marvelously cured 2,000
soldiers of fever in the camp of Piccinino. While still an invalid,
Aeneas rode over the mountains to Basle, and got well on the journey.
We learn something more about the neighborhood of Norcia through the
necromancer who tried to get Benvenuto Cellini into his power. A new
book of magic was to be consecrated, and the best place for the
ceremony was among the mountains in that district. The master of the
magician had once, it is true, done the same thing near the abbey of
Farfa, but had there found difficulties which did not present
themselves at Norcia; further, the peasants in the latter neighborhood
were trustworthy people who had had practice in the matter, and who
could afford considerable help in case of need. The expedition did not
take place, else Benvenuto would probably have been able to tell us
something of the impostor's assistants. The whole neighborhood was then
proverbial. Aretino says somewhere of an enchanted well, 'there dwell
the sisters of the sibyl of Norcia and the aunt of the Fata Gloriana.'
And about the same time Trissino could still celebrate the place in his
great epic with all the resources of poetry and allegory as the home of
authentic prophecy.
After the notorious Bull of Innocent VIII (1484), witchcraft and the
persecution of witches grew into a great and revolting system. The
chief representatives of this system of persecution were German
Dominicans; and Germany and, curiously enough, those parts of Italy
nearest Germany were the countries most afflicted by this plague. The
bulls and injunctions of the Popes themselves refer, for example, to
the Dominican Province of Lombardy, to Cremona, to the dioceses of
Brescia and Bergamo. We learn from Sprenger's famous theoretico-practical
guide, the 'Malleus Maleficarum,' that forty-one witches were
burnt at Como in the first year after the publication of the bull;
crowds of Italian women took refuge in the territory of the Archduke
Sigismund, where they believed themselves to be still safe. Witchcraft
ended by taking firm root in a few unlucky Alpine valleys, especially
in the Val Camonica; the system of persecution had succeeded in
permanently infecting with the delusion those populations which were in
any way predisposed for it. This essentially German form of witchcraft
is what we should think of when reading the stories and novels of Milan
or Bologna. That it did not make further progress in Italy is probably
due to the fact that here a highly developed 'stregheria' was already
in existence, resting on a different set of ideas. The Italian witch
practiced a trade, and needed for it money and, above all, sense. We
find nothing about her of the hysterical dreams of the Northern witch,
of marvelous journeys through the air, of Incubus and Succubus; the
business of the 'strega' was to provide for other people's pleasures.
If she was credited with the power of assuming different shapes, or of
transporting herself suddenly to distant places, she was so far content
to accept this reputation, as her influence was thereby increased; on
the other hand, it was perilous for her when the fear of her malice and
vengeance, and especially of her power for enchanting children, cattle,
and crops, became general. Inquisitors and magistrates were then most
thoroughly in accord with popular wishes if they burnt her.
By far the most important field for the activity of the 'strega' lay,
as has been said, in love-affairs, and included the stirring up of love
and of hatred, the producing of abortion, the pretended murder of the
unfaithful man or woman by magical arts, and even the manufacture of
poisons. Owing to the unwillingness of many persons to have to do with
these women, class of occasional practitioners arose who secretly
learned from them some one or other of their arts, and then used this
knowledge on their own account. The Roman prostitutes, for example,
tried to enhance their personal attractions by charms of another
description in the style of the Horatian Canidia. Aretino may not only
have known, but have also told the truth about them in this particular.
He gives a list of the loathsome messes which were to be found in their
boxes--hair, skulls, ribs, teeth, dead men's eyes, human skin, the
navels of little children, the soles of shoes and pieces of clothing
from tombs. They even went themselves to the graveyard and fetched bits
of rotten flesh, which they slyly gave their lovers to eat--with more
that is still worse. Pieces of the hair and nails of the lover were
boiled in oil stolen from the ever-burning lamps in the church. The
most innocuous of their charms was to make a heart of glowing ashes,
and then to pierce it while singing:
'Prima che'l fuoco spenghi,
Fa ch'a mia porta venghi;
Tal ti punga mio amore
Quale io fo questo cuore.'
There were other charms practiced by moonshine, with drawings on the
ground, and figures of wax or bronze, which doubtless represented the
lover, and were treated according to circumstances.
These things were so customary that a woman who, without youth and
beauty, nevertheless exercised a powerful charm on men, naturally
became suspected of witchcraft. The mother of Sanga, secretary to
Clement VII, poisoned her son's mistress, who was a woman of this kind.
Unfortunately the son died too, as well as a party of friends who had
eaten of the poisoned salad.
Next comes, not as helper, but as competitor to the witch, the magician
or enchanter--'incantatore'--who was still more familiar with the most
perilous business of the craft. Sometimes he was as much or more of an
astrologer than of a magician; he probably often gave himself out as an
astrologer in order not to be prosecuted as a magician, and a certain
astrology was essential in order to find out the favourable hour for a
magical process. But since many spirits are good or indifferent, the
magician could sometimes maintain a very tolerable reputation, and
Sixtus IV, in the year 1474, had to proceed expressly against some
Bolognese Carmelites, who asserted in the pulpit that there was no harm
in seeking information from the demons. Very many people believed in
the possibility of the thing itself; an indirect proof of this lies in
the fact that the most pious men believed that by prayer they could
obtain visions of good spirits. Savonarola's mind was filled with these
things; the Florentine Platonists speak of a mystic union with God; and
Marcellus Palingenius gives us to understand clearly enough that he had
to do with consecrated spirits. The same writer is convinced of the
existence of a whole hierarchy of bad demons, who have their seat from
the moon downwards, and are ever on the watch to do some mischief to
nature and human life. He even tells of his own personal acquaintance
with some of them, and as the scope of the present work does not allow
of a systematic exposition of the then prevalent belief in spirits, the
narrative of Palingenius may be given as one instance out of many.
At San Silvestro, on Soracte, he had been receiving instruction from a
pious hermit on the nothingness of earthly things and the worthlessness
of human life; and when the night drew near he set out on his way back
to home. On the road, in the full light of the moon, he was joined by
three men, one of whom called him by name, and asked him whence he
came. Palingenius made answer: 'From the wise man on the mountain.' 'O
fool,' replied the stranger, 'dost thou in truth believe that anyone on
earth is wise? Only higher beings (Divi) have wisdom, and such are we
three, although we wear the shapes of men. I am named Saracil, and
these two Sathiel and Jana. Our kingdom lies near the moon, where dwell
that multitude of intermediate beings who have sway over earth and
sea.' Palingenius then asked, not without an inward tremor, what they
were going to do at Rome. The answer was: 'One of our comrades, Ammon,
is kept in servitude by the magic arts of a youth from Narni, one of
the attendants of Cardinal Orsini; for mark it, O men, there is proof
of your own immortality therein, that you can control one of us: I
myself shut up in crystal, was once forced to serve a German, till a
bearded monk set me free. This is the service which we wish to render
at Rome to our friend, and he shall also take the opportunity of
sending one or two distinguished Romans to the nether world.' At these
words a light breeze arose, and Sathiel said: 'Listen, our messenger is
coming back from Rome, and this wind announces him.' And then another
being appeared, whom they greeted joyfully and then asked about Rome.
His utterances are strongly anti-papal: Clement VII was again allied
with the Spaniards and hoped to root out Luther's doctrines, not with
arguments, but by the Spanish sword. This is wholly in the interest of
the demons, whom the impending bloodshed would enable to carry away the
souls of thousands into hell. At the close of this conversation, in
which Rome with all its guilt is represented as wholly given over to
the Evil One, the apparitions vanish, and leave the poet sorrowfully to
pursue his way alone.
Those who would form a conception of the extent of the belief in those
relations to the demons which could be openly avowed in spite of the
penalties attaching to witchcraft, may be referred to the much-read
work of Agrippa of Nettesheim 'On secret Philosophy.' He seems
originally to have written it before he was in Italy, but in the
dedication to Trithemius he mentions Italian authorities among others,
if only by way of disparagement. In the case of equivocal persons like
Agrippa, or of the knaves and fools into whom the majority of the rest
may be divided, there is little that is interesting in the system they
profess, with its formula, fumigations, ointments, and the rest of it.
But this system was filled with quotations from the superstitions of
antiquity, the influence of which on the life and the passions of
Italians is at times most remarkable and fruitful. We might think that
a great mind must be thoroughly ruined, before it surrendered itself to
such influences; but the violence of hope and desire led even vigorous
and original men of all classes to have recourse to the magician, and
the belief that the thing was feasible at all weakened to some extent
the faith, even of those who kept at a distance, in the moral order of
the world. At the cost of a little money and danger it seemed possible
to defy with impunity the universal reason and morality of mankind, and
to spare oneself the intermediate steps which otherwise lie between a
man and his lawful or unlawful ends.
Let us here glance for a moment at an older and now decaying form of
superstition. From the darkest period of the Middle Ages, or even from
the days of antiquity, many cities of Italy had kept the remembrance of
the connection of their fate with certain buildings, statues, or other
material objects. The ancients had left records of consecrating priests
or Telestae, who were present at the solemn foundation of cities, and
magically guaranteed their prosperity by erecting certain monuments or
by burying certain objects (Telesmata). Traditions of this sort were
more likely than anything else to live on in the form of popular,
unwritten legend; but in the course of centuries the priest naturally
became transformed into the magician, since the religious side of his
function was no longer understood. In some of the Virgilian miracles at
Naples, the ancient remembrance of one of these Telestae is clearly
preserved, his name being in course of time supplanted by that of
Virgil. The enclosing of the mysterious picture of the city in a vessel
is neither more nor less than a genuine ancient Telesma; and Virgil, as
founder of Naples, is but the officiating priest who took part in the
ceremony, presented in another dress. The popular imagination went on
working at these themes, till Virgil became also responsible for the
brazen horse, for the heads at the Nolan gate, for the brazen fly over
another gate, and even for the Grotto of Posilippo--all of them things
which in one respect or other served to put a magical constraint upon
fate, and the first two of which seemed to determine the whole fortune
of the city. Medieval Rome also preserved confused recollections of the
same kind. At the church of Sant' Ambrogio at Milan, there was an
ancient marble Hercules; so long, it was said, as this stood in its
place, so long would the Empire last. That of the Germans is probably
meant, as the coronation of their emperors at Milan took place in this
church. The Florentines were convinced that the temple of Mars,
afterwards transformed into the Baptistery, would stand to the end of
time, according to the constellation under which it had been built;
they had, as Christians, removed from it the marble equestrian statue;
but since the destruction of the latter would have brought some great
calamity on the city--also according to a constellation--they set it
upon a tower by the Arno. When Totila conquered Florence, the statue
fell into the river, and was not fished out again till Charlemagne
refounded the city. It was then placed on a pillar at the entrance to
the Ponte Vecchio, and on this spot Buondelmonti was slain in 1215. The
origin of the great feud between Guelph and Ghibelline was thus
associated with the dreaded idol. During the inundation of 1333 the
statue vanished for ever.
But the same Telesma reappears elsewhere. Guido Bonatto, already
mentioned, was not satisfied, at the refounding of the walls of Forli,
with requiring certain symbolic acts of reconciliation from the two
parties. By burying a bronze or stone equestrian statue, which he had
produced by astrological or magical arts, he believed that he had
defended the city from ruin, and even from capture and plunder. When
Cardinal Albornoz was governor of Romagna some sixty years later, the
statue was accidentally dug up and then shown to the people, probably
by the order of the Cardinal, that it might be known by what means the
cruel Montefeltro had defended himself against the Roman Church. And
again, half a century later, when an attempt to surprise Forli had
failed, men began to talk afresh of the virtue of the statue, which had
perhaps been saved and reburied. It was the last time that they could
do so; for a year later Forli was really taken. The foundation of
buildings all through the fifteenth century was associated not only
with astrology but also with magic. The large number of gold and silver
medals which Paul II buried in the foundation of his buildings was
noticed, and Platina was by no means displeased to recognize an old
pagan Telesma in the fact. Neither Paul nor his biographer were in any
way conscious of the mediaeval religious significance of such an
offering.
But this official magic, which in many cases only rests on hearsay, was
comparatively unimportant by the side of the secret arts practiced for
personal ends.
The form which these most often took in daily life is shown by Ariosto
in his comedy of the necromancers. His hero is one of the many Jewish
exiles from Spain, although he also gives himself out for a Greek, an
Egyptian, and an African, and is constantly changing his name and
costume. He pretends that his incantations can darken the day and
lighten the darkness, that he can move the earth, make himself
invisible, and change men into beasts; but these vaunts are only an
advertisement. His true object is to make his account out of unhappy
and troubled marriages, and the traces which he leaves behind him in
his course are like the slime of a snail, or often like the ruin
wrought by a hailstorm. To attain his ends he can persuade people that
the box in which a lover is hidden is full of ghosts, or that he can
make a corpse talk. It is at all events a good sign that poets and
novelists could reckon on popular applause in holding up this class of
men to ridicule. Bandello not only treats this sorcery of a Lombard
monk as a miserable, and in its consequences terrible, piece of
knavery, but he also describes with unaffected indignation the
disasters which never cease to pursue the credulous fool. 'A man hopes
with "Solomon's Key' and other magical books to find the treasures
hidden in the bosom of the earth, to force his lady to do his will, to
find out the secret of princes, and to transport himself in the
twinkling of an eye from Milan to Rome. The more often he is deceived,
the more steadfastly he believes.... Do you remember the time, Signor
Carlo, when a friend of ours, in order to win a favour of his beloved,
filled his room with skulls and bones like a churchyard?' The most
loathsome tasks were prescribed--to draw three teeth from a corpse or a
nail from its finger, and the like; and while the hocus-pocus of the
incantation was going on, the unhappy participants sometimes died of
terror.
Benvenuto Cellini did not die during the well-known incantation (1532)
in the Colosseum at Rome, although both he and his companions witnessed
no ordinary horrors; the Sicilian priest, who probably expected to find
him a useful coadjutor in the future, paid him the compliment as they
went home of saying that he had never met a man of so sturdy a courage.
Every reader will make his own reflections on the proceedings
themselves. The narcotic fumes and the fact that the imaginations of
the spectators were predisposed for all possible terrors, are the chief
points to be noticed, and explain why the lad who formed one of the
party, and on whom they made most impression, saw much more than the
others. but it may be inferred that Benvenuto himself was the one whom
it was wished to impress, since the dangerous beginning of the incantation can have had no other aim than to arouse curiosity. For
Benvenuto had to think before the fair Angelica occurred to him; and
the magician told him afterwards that love-making was folly compared
with the finding of treasures. Further, it must not be forgotten that
it flattered his vanity to be able to say, 'The demons have kept their
word, and Angelica came into my hands, as they promised, just a month
later' (I, cap. 68). Even on the supposition that Benvenuto gradually
lied himself into believing the whole story, it would still be
permanently valuable as evidence of the mode of thought then prevalent.
As a rule, however, the Italian artists, even 'the odd, capricious,
and eccentric' among them, had little to do with magic. One of them, in
his anatomical studies, may have cut himself a jacket out of the skin
of a corpse, but at the advice of his confessor he put it again into
the grave. Indeed the frequent study of anatomy probably did more than
anything else to destroy the belief in the magical influence of various
parts of the body, while at the same time the incessant observation and
representation of the human form made the artist familiar with a magic
of a wholly different sort.
In general, notwithstanding the instances which have been quoted, magic
seems to have been markedly on the decline at the beginning of the
sixteenth century--that is to say, at a time when it first began to
flourish vigorously out of Italy; and thus the tours of Italian
sorcerers and astrologers in the North seem not to have begun till
their credit at home was thoroughly impaired. In the fourteenth century
it was thought necessary carefully to watch the lake on Mount Pilatus,
near Scariotto, to hinder the magicians from there consecrating their
books. In the fifteenth century we find, for example, that the offer
was made to produce a storm of rain, in order to frighten away a
besieged army; and even then the commander of the besieged town,
Niccolo Vitelli in Citta di Castello had the good sense to dismiss the
sorcerers as godless persons. In the sixteenth century no more
instances of this official kind appear, although in private life the
magicians were still active. To this time belongs the classic figure of
German sorcery, Dr. Johann Faust; the Italian ideal, on the other hand,
Guido Bonatto, dates back to the thirteenth century.
It must nevertheless be added that the decrease of the belief in magic
was not necessarily accompanied by an increase of the belief in a moral
order, but that in many cases, like the decaying faith in astrology,
the delusion left behind it nothing but a stupid fatalism.
One or two minor forms of this superstition, pyromancy, chiromancy and
others, which obtained some credit as the belief in sorcery and
astrology was declining, may be here passed over, and even the
pseudo-science of physiognomy has by no means the interest which the name
might lead us to expect. For it did not appear as the sister and ally
of art and psychology, but as a new form of fatalistic superstition,
and, what it may have been among the Arabs, as the rival of astrology.
The author of a physiognomical treatise, Bartolommeo Cocle, who styled
himself a 'metoposcopist,' and whose science, according to Giovio,
seemed like one of the most respectable of the free arts, was not
content with the prophecies which he made to the many people who daily
consulted him, but wrote also a most serious 'catalogue of such whom
great dangers to life were awaiting.' Giovio, although grown old in the
free thought of Rome 'in hac luce romana'--is of opinion that the
predictions contained therein had only too much truth in them We learn
from the same source how the people aimed at in these and similar
prophecies took vengeance on a seer. Giovanni Bentivoglio caused Lucas
Gauricus to be five times swung to and fro against the wall, on a rope
hanging from a lofty, winding staircase, because Lucas had foretold to
him the loss of his authority. Ermes Bentivoglio sent an assassin after
Cocle, because the unlucky metopOscopist had unwillingly prophesied to
him that he would die an exile in battle. The murderer seems to have
derided the dying man in his last moments, saying that Cocle himself
had foretold him he would shortly commit an infamous murder. The
reviver of chiromancy, Antioco Tiberto of Cesena, came by an equally
miserable end at the hands of Pandolfo Malatesta of Rimini, to whom he
had prophesied the worst that a tyrant can imagine, namely, death in
exile and in the most grievous poverty. Tiberto was a man of
intelligence, who was supposed to give his answers less according to
any methodical chiromancy than by means of his shrewd knowledge of
mankind; and his high culture won for him the respect of those scholars
who thought little of his divination.
Alchemy, in conclusion, which is not mentioned in antiquity till quite
late under Diocletian, played only a very subordinate part at the best
period of the Renaissance. Italy went through the disease earlier, when
Petrarch in the fourteenth century confessed, in his polemic against
it, that gold-making was a general practice. Since then that particular
kind of faith, devotion, and isolation which the practice of alchemy
required became more and more rare in Italy, just when Italian and
other adepts began to make their full profit out of the great lords in
the North. Under Leo X the few Italians who busied themselves with it
were called 'ingenia curiosa,' and Aurelio Augurelli, who dedicated to
Leo X, the great despiser of gold, his didactic poem on the making of
the metal, is said to have received in return a beautiful but empty
purse. The mystic science which besides gold sought for the omnipotent
philosopher's stone, is a late northern growth, which had its rise in
the theories of Paracelsus and others.