ourneys of the Italians
Freed from the countless bonds which elsewhere in Europe checked
progress, having reached a high degree of individual development and
been schooled by the teachings of antiquity, the Italian mind now
turned to the discovery of the outward universe, and to the
representation of it in speech and form.
On the journeys of the Italians to distant parts of the world, we can
here make but a few general observations. The Crusades had opened
unknown distances to the European mind, and awakened in all the passion
for travel and adventure. It may be hard to indicate precisely the
point where this passion allied itself with, or became the servant of,
the thirst for knowledge; but it was in Italy that this was first and
most completely the case. Even in the Crusades the interest of the
Italians was wider than that of other nations, since they already were
a naval power and had commercial relations with the East. From time
immemorial the Mediterranean Sea had given to the nations that dwelt on
its shores mental impulses different from those which governed the
peoples of the North; and never, from the very structure of their
character, could the Italians be adventurers in the sense which the
word bore among the Teutons. After they were once at home in all the
eastern harbors of the Mediterranean, it was natural that the most
enterprising among them should be led to join that vast inter- national
movement of the Mohammedans which there found its outlet. A new half of
the world lay, as it were, freshly discovered before them. Or, like
Polo of Venice, they were caught in the current of the Mongolian
peoples, and carried on to the steps of the throne of the Great Khan.
At an early period, we find Italians sharing in the discoveries made in
the Atlantic Ocean; it was the Genoese who, in the thirteenth century
found the Canary Islands. In the same year, 1291, when Ptolemais, the
last remnant of the Christian East, was lost, it was again the Genoese
who made the first known attempt to find a sea-passage to the East
Indies. Columbus himself is but the greatest of a long list of Italians
who, in the service of the western nations, sailed into distant seas.
The true discoverer, however, is not the man who first chances to
stumble upon anything, but the man who finds what he has sought. Such a
one alone stands in a link with the thoughts and interests of his
predecessors, and this relationship will also determine the account he
gives of his search. For which reason the Italians, although their
claim to be the first comers on this or that shore may be disputed,
will yet retain their title to be pre-eminently the nation of
discoverers for the whole latter part of the Middle Ages. The fuller
proof of this assertion belongs to the special history of discoveries.
Yet ever and again we turn with admiration to the august figure of the
great Genoese, by whom a new continent beyond the ocean was demanded,
sought and found; and who was the first to be able to say: 'il mondo e
poco'--the world is not so large as men have thought. At the time when
Spain gave Alexander VI to the Italians, Italy gave Columbus to the
Spaniards. Only a few weeks before the death of that pope Columbus
wrote from Jamaica his noble letter (July 7, 1503) to the thankless
Catholic kings, which the ages to come can never read without profound
emotion. In a codicil to his will, dated Valladolid, May 4, I 506, he
bequeathed to 'his beloved home, the Republic of Genoa, the prayer-book
which Pope Alexander had given him, and which in prison, in conflict,
and in every kind of adversity, had been to him the greatest of
comforts.' It seems as if these words cast upon the abhorred name of
Borgia one last gleam of grace and mercy.
The development of geographical and allied sciences among the Italians
must, like the history of their voyages, be touched upon but very
briefly. A superficial comparison of their achievements with those of
other nations shows an early and striking superiority on their part.
Where, in the middle of the fifteenth century, could be found, anywhere
but in Italy, such a union of geographical, statistical, and historical
knowledge as was found in Aeneas Sylvius? Not only in his great
geographical work, but in his letters and commentaries, he describes
with equal mastery landscapes, cities, manners, industries and
products, political conditions and constitutions, wherever he can use
his own observation or the evidence of eye-witnesses. What he takes
from books is naturally of less moment. Even the short sketch of that
valley in the Tyrolese Alps where Frederick III had given him a
benefice, and still more his description of Scotland, leaves untouched
none of the relations of human life, and displays a power and method of
unbiased observation and comparison impossible in any but a countryman
of Columbus, trained in the school of the ancients. Thousands saw and,
in part, knew what he did, but they felt no impulse to draw a picture
of it, and were unconscious that the world desired such pictures.
In geography, as in other matters, it is vain to attempt to distinguish
how much is to be attributed to the study of the ancients, and how much
to the special genius of the Italians. They saw and treated the things
of this world from an objective point of view, even before they were
familiar with ancient literature, partly because they were themselves a
half-ancient people, and partly because their political circumstances
predisposed them to it; but they would not so rapidly have attained to
such perfection had not the old geographers shown them the way. The
influence of the existing Italian geographies on the spirit and
tendencies of the travellers and discoverers was also inestimable. Even
the simple 'dilettante' of a science-- if in the present case we should
assign to Aeneas Sylvius so low a rank--can diffuse just that sort of
general interest in the subject which prepares for new pioneers the
indispensable favourable predisposition in the public mind. True
discoverers in any science know well what they owe to such meditation.