t was for this society--or rather for his own sake--that the
'Cortigiano,' as described to us by Castiglione, educated himself. He
was the ideal man of society, and was regarded by the civili- zation of
that age as its choicest flower; and the court existed for him rather
than he for the court. Indeed, such a man would have been out of place
at any court, since he himself possessed all the gifts and the bearing
of an accomplished ruler, and because his calm supremacy in all things,
both outward and spiritual, implied a too independent nature. The inner
impulse which inspired him was directed, though our author does not
acknowledge the fact, not to the service of the prince, but to his own
perfection. One instance will make this clear. In time of war the
courtier refuses even useful and perilous tasks, if they are not
beautiful and dignified in themselves, such as, for instance, the
capture of a herd of cattle; what urges him to take part in war is not
duty but 'l'onore.' The moral relation to the prince, as described in
the fourth book, is singularly free and independent. The theory of
well-bred love-making, set forth in the third book, is full of delicate
psychological observation, which perhaps would be more in place in a
treatise on human nature generally; and the magnificent praise of ideal
love, which occurs at the end of the fourth book, and which rises to a
lyrical elevation of feeling, has no connection whatever with the
special object of the work. Yet here, as in the 'Asolani' of Bembo, the
culture of the time shows itself in the delicacy with which this
sentiment is represented and analyzed. It is true that these writers
are not in all cases to be taken literally; but that the discourses
they give us were actually frequent in good society, cannot be doubted,
and that it was an affectation, but genuine passion, which appeared in
this dress, we shall see further on.
Among outward accomplishments, the so-called knightly exercises were
expected in thorough perfection from the courtier, and besides these
much that could only exist at courts highly organized and based on
personal emulation, such as were not to be found out of Italy. Other
points obviously rest on an abstract notion of individual perfection.
The courtier must be at home in all noble sports, among them running,
leaping, swimming and wrestling; he must, above all things, be a good
dancer and, as a matter of course, an accomplished rider. He must be
master of several languages, at all events of Latin and Italian; he
must be familiar with literature and have some knowledge of the fine
arts. In music a certain practical skill was expected of him, which he
was bound, nevertheless, to keep as secret as possible. All this is not
to be taken too seriously, except what relates to the use of arms. The
mutual interaction of these gifts and accomplishments results in the
perfect man, in whom no one quality usurps the place of the rest.
So much is certain, that in the sixteenth century the Italians had all
Europe for their pupils both theoretically and practically in every
noble bodily exercise and in the habits and manners of good society.
Their instructions and their illustrated books on riding, fencing, and
dancing served as the model to other countries. Gymnastics as an art,
apart both from military training and from mere amusement, was probably
first taught by Vittorino da Feltre and after his time became essential
to a complete education. The important fact is that they were taught
systematically, though what exercises were most in favour, and whether
they resembled those now in use, we are unable to say. But we may
infer, not only from the general character of the people, but from
positive evidence which has been left for us, that not only strength
and skill, but grace of movement was one of the main objects of
physical training. It is enough to remind the reader of the great
Federigo of Urbino directing the evening games of the young people
committed to his care.
The games and contests of the popular classes did not differ
essentially from those which prevailed elsewhere in Europe. In the
maritime cities boat-racing was among the number, and the Venetian
regattas were famous at an early period. The classical game of Italy
was and is the ball; and this was probably played at the time of the
Renaissance with more zeal and brilliancy than elsewhere. But on this
point no distinct evidence is forthcoming.