ut in proportion as distinctions of birth ceased to confer any special
privilege, was the individual himself compelled to make the most of his
personal qualities, and society to find its worth and charm in itself.
The demeanor of individuals, and all the higher forms of social
intercourse, became ends pursued a deliberate and artistic purpose.
Even the outward appearance of men and women and the habits of daily
life were more perfect, more beautiful, and more polished than among
the other nations of Europe. The dwellings of the upper classes fall
rather within the province of the history of art; but we may note how
far the castle and the city mansion in Italy surpassed in comfort,
order, and harmony the dwellings of the northern noble. The style of
dress varied sc continually that it is impossible to make any complete
comparison with the fashions of other countries, all the more because
since the close of the fifteenth century imitations of the latter were
frequent. The costumes of the time, as given us by the Italian
painters, are the most convenient, and the most pleasing to the eye
which were then to be found in Europe; but we cannot be sure if they
represent the prevalent fashion, or if they are faithfully reproduced
by the artist. It is nevertheless beyond a doubt that nowhere was so
much importance attached to dress as in Italy. The nation was, and is,
vain; and even serious men among it looked on a handsome and becoming
costume as an element in the perfection of the individual. At Florence,
indeed, there was a brief period when dress was a purely personal
matter, and every man set the fashion for himself, and till far into
the sixteenth century there were exceptional people who still had the
courage to do so; and the majority at all events showed themselves
capable of varying the fashion according to their individual tastes. It
is a symptom of decline when Giovanni della Casa warns his readers not
to be singular or to depart from existing fashions Our own age, which,
in men's dress at any rate, treats uniformity as the supreme law, gives
up by so doing far more than it is aware of. But it saves itself much
time, and this, according to our notions of business, outweighs all
other disadvantages.
In Venice and Florence at the time of the Renaissance there were rules
and regulations prescribing the dress of the men and restraining the
luxury of the women. Where the fashions were more free, as in Naples,
the moralists confess with regret that no difference can be observed
between noble and burgher. They further deplore the rapid changes of
fashion, and--if we rightly understand their words--the senseless
idolatry of whatever comes from France, though in many cases the
fashions which were received back from the French were originally
Italian. It does not further concern us how far these frequent changes,
and the adoption of French and Spanish ways, contributed to the
national passion for external display; but we find in them additional
evidence of the rapid movement of life in Italy in the decades before
and after the year 1500.
We may note in particular the efforts of the women to alter their
appearance by all the means which the toilette could afford. In no
country of Europe since the fall of the Roman Empire was so much
trouble taken to modify the face, the color of the skin and the growth
of the hair, as in Italy at this time. All tended to the formation of a
conventional type, at the cost of the most striking and transparent
deceptions. Leaving out of account costume in general, which in the
fourteenth century was in the highest degree varied in color and loaded
with ornament, and at a later period assumed a character of more
harmonious richness, we here limit ourselves more particularly to the
toilette in the narrower sense.
No sort of ornament was more in use than false hair, often made of
white or yellow silk.81 The law denounced and forbade it in vain, till
some preacher of repentance touched the worldly minds of the wearers.
Then was seen, in the middle of the public square, a lofty pyre
(talamo), on which, besides lutes, diceboxes, masks, magical charms,
song-books, and other vanities, lay masses of false hair, which the
purging fires soon turned into a heap of ashes. The ideal color sought
for both natural and artificial hair was blond. And as the sun was
supposed to have the power of making the hair this color, many ladies
would pass their whole time in the open air on sunshiny days. Dyes and
other mixtures were also used freely for the same purpose. Besides all
these, we meet with an endless list of beautifying waters, plasters,
and paints for every single part of the face--even for the teeth and
eyelids--of which in our day we can form no conception. The ridicule of
the poets, the invectives of the preachers, and the experience of the
baneful effects of these cosmetics on the skin, were powerless to
hinder women from giving their faces an unnatural form and color. It is
possible that the frequent and splendid representations of Mysteries,82
at which hundreds of people appeared painted and masked, helped to
further this practice in daily life. It is certain that it was
widespread, and that the countrywomen vied in this respect with their
sisters in the towns. It was vain to preach that such decorations were
the mark of the courtesan; the most honorable matrons, who all the year
round never touched paint, used it nevertheless on holidays when they
showed themselves in public. But whether we look on this bad habit as a
remnant of barbarism, to which the painting of savages is a parallel,
or as a consequence of the desire for perfect youthful beauty in
feature and in color, as the art and complexity of the toilette would
lead us to think--in either case there was no lack of good advice on
the part of the men. The use of perfumes, too, went beyond all
reasonable limits. They were applied to everything with which human
beings came into contact. At festivals even the mules were treated with
scents and ointments, and Pietro Aretino thanks Cosimo I for a perfumed
roll of money.
The Italians of that day lived in the belief that they were more
cleanly than other nations. There are in fact general reasons which
speak rather for than against this claim. Cleanliness is indispensable
to our modern notion of social perfection, which was developed in Italy
earlier than elsewhere. That the Italians were one of the richest of
existing peoples, is another presumption in their favour. Proof, either
for or against these pretensions, can of course never be forthcoming,
and if the question were one of priority in establishing rules of
cleanliness, the chivalrous poetry of the Middle Ages is perhaps in
advance of anything that Italy can produce. It is nevertheless certain
that the singular neatness and cleanliness of some distinguished
representatives of the Renaissance, especially in their behavior at
meals, was noticed expressly,83 and that 'German' was the synonym in
Italy for all that is filthy. The dirty habits which Massimiliano
Sforza picked up in the course of his German education, and the notice
they attracted on his return to Italy, are recorded by Giovio. It is at
the same time very curious that, at least in the fifteenth century, the
inns and hotels were left chiefly in the hands of Germans, who
probably, however, made their profit mostly out of the pilgrims
journeying to Rome. Yet the statements on this point may refer mainly
to the country districts, since it is notorious that in the great
cities Italian hotels held the first place. The want of decent inns in
the country may also be explained by the general insecurity of life and
property.
To the first half of the sixteenth century belongs the manual of
politeness which Giovanni della Casa, a Florentine by birth, published
under the title 'Il Galateo.' Not only cleanliness in the strict sense
of the word, but the dropping of all the habits which we consider
unbecoming, is here prescribed with the same unfailing tact with which
the moralist discerns the highest ethical truths. In the literature of
other countries the same lessons are taught, though less
systematically, by the indirect influence of repulsive descriptions.
In other respects also, the 'Galateo' is a graceful and in- telligent
guide to good manners--a school of tact and delicacy. Even now it may
be read with no small profit by people of all classes, and the
politeness of European nations is not likely to outgrow its precepts.
So far as tact is an affair of the heart, it has been inborn in some
men from the dawn of civilization, and acquired through force of will
by others; but the Italians were the first to recognize it as a
universal social duty and a mark of culture and education. And Italy
itself had altered much in the course of two centuries. We feel at
their close that the time for practical jokes between friends and
acquaintances --for 'burle' and 'beffe'--was over in good society, that
the people had emerged from the walls of the cities and had learned a
cosmopolitan politeness and consideration. We shall speak later on of
the intercourse of society in the narrower sense.
Outward life, indeed, in the fifteenth and the early part of the
sixteenth centuries, was polished and ennobled as among ¦ no other
people in the world. A countless number of those small things and great
things which combine to make up what we: mean by comfort, we know to
have first appeared in Italy. In | the well-paved streets of the
Italian cities, driving was universal, while elsewhere in Europe
walking or riding was the custom, and at all events no one drove for
amusement. We read in the novelists of soft, elastic beads, of costly
carpets and bedroom furniture, of which we hear nothing in other
countries. We often hear especially of the abundance and beauty of the
linen. Much of all this is drawn within the sphere of art. We note with
admiration the thousand ways in which art ennobles luxury, not only
adorning the massive sideboard or the light brackets with noble vases,
clothing the walls with the movable splendor of tapestry, and covering
the toilet-table with numberless graceful trifles, but absorbing whole
branches of mechanical work--especially carpentering--into its
province. All Western Europe, as soon as its wealth enabled it to do
so, set to work in the same way at the close of the Middle Ages. But
its efforts produced either childish and fantastic toy-work, or were
bound by the chains of a narrow and purely Gothic art, while the
Renaissance moved freely, entering into the spirit of every task it
undertook and working for a far larger circle of patrons and admirers
than the northern artists. The rapid victory of Italian decorative art
over northern in the course sixteenth century is due partly to this
fact, though the result of wider and more general causes.