orality and Judgement
The relation of the various peoples of the earth to the supreme
interests of life, to God, virtue, and immortality, may be investigated
up to a certain point, but can never be compared to one another with
absolute strictness and certainty. The more plainly in these matters
our evidence seems to speak, the more carefully must we refrain from
unqualified assumptions and rash generalizations.
This remark is especially true with regard to our judgement on
questions of morality. It may be possible to indicate many contrasts
and shades of difference among different nations, but to strike the
balance of the whole is not given to human insight. The ultimate truth
with respect to the character, the conscience, and the guilt of a
people remains for ever a secret; if only for the reason that its
defects have another side, where they reappear as peculiarities or even
as virtues. We must leave those who find pleasure in passing sweeping
censures on whole nations, to do so as they like. The people of Europe
can maltreat, but happily not judge one another. A great nation,
interwoven by its civilization, its achievements, and its fortunes with
the whole life of the modern world, can afford to ignore both its
advocates and its accusers. It lives on with or without the approval of
theorists.
Accordingly, what here follows is no judgement, but rather a string of
marginal notes, suggested by a study of the Italian Renaissance
extending over some years. The value to be attached to them is all the
more qualified as they mostly touch on the life of the upper classes,
with respect to which we are far better informed in Italy than in any
other country in Europe at that period. But though both fame and infamy
sound louder here than elsewhere, we are not helped thereby in forming
an adequate moral estimate of the people.
What eye can pierce the depths in which the character and fate of
nations are determined?--in which that which is inborn and that which
has been experienced combine to form a new whole and a fresh nature?--in
which even those intellectual capacities which at first sight we
should take to be most original are in fact evolved late and slowly?
Who can tell if the Italian before the thirteenth century possessed
that flexible activity and certainty in his whole being--that play of
power in shaping whatever subject he dealt with in word or in form,
which was peculiar to him later? And if no answer can be found to these
questions, how can we possibly judge of the infinite and infinitely
intricate channels through which character and intellect are
incessantly pouring their influence one upon the other. A tribunal
there is for each one of us, whose voice is our conscience; but let us
have done with these generalities about nations. For the people that
seems to be most sick the cure may be at hand; and one that appears to
be healthy may bear within it the ripening germs of death, which the
hour of danger will bring forth from their hiding-place.