or the position of the Italians in the sphere of the natural sciences,
we must refer the reader to the special treatises on the subject, of
which the only one with which we are familiar is the superficial and
depreciatory work of Libri. The dispute as to the priority of
particular discoveries concerns us all the less, since we hold that, at
any time, and among any civilized people, a man may appear who,
starting with very scanty preparation, is driven by an irresistible
impulse into the path of scientific investigation, and through his
native gifts achieves the most astonishing success. Such men were
Gerbert of Rheims and Roger Bacon. That they were masters of the whole
knowledge of the age in their several departments was a natural
consequence of the spirit in which they worked. When once the veil of
illusion was torn asunder, when once the dread of nature and the
slavery to books and tradition were overcome, countless problems lay
before them for solution. It is another matter when a whole people
takes a natural delight in the study and investigation of nature, at a
time when other nations are indifferent, that is to say, when the
discoverer is not threatened or wholly ignored, but can count on the
friendly support of congenial spirits. That this was the case in Italy
is unquestionable. The Italian students of nature trace with pride in
the 'Divine Comedy' the hints and proofs of Dante's scientific
interest in nature. On his claim to priority in this or that discovery or
reference, we must leave the men of science to decide; but every layman
must be struck by the wealth of his observations on the external world,
shown merely in his picture and comparisons. He, more than any other
modern poet, takes them from reality, whether in nature or human life,
and uses them never as mere ornament, but in order to give the reader
the fullest and most adequate sense of his meaning. It is in astronomy
that he appears chiefly as a scientific specialist, though it must not
be forgotten that many astronomical allusions in his great poem, which
now appear to us learned, must then have been intelligible to the
general reader. Dante, learning apart, appeals to a popular knowledge
of the heavens, which the Italians of his day, from the mere fact that
they were a nautical people, had in common with the ancients. This
knowledge of the rising and setting of the constellations has been
rendered superfluous to the modern world by calendars and clocks, and
with it has gone whatever interest in astronomy the people may once
have had. Nowadays, with our schools and handbooks, every child knows--what
Dante did not know--that the earth moves round the sun; but the
interest once taken in the subject itself has given place, except in
the case of astronomical specialists, to the most absolute
indifference.
The pseudo-science which dealt with the stars proves nothing against
the inductive spirit of the Italians of that day. That spirit was but
crossed, and at times overcome, by the passionate desire to penetrate
the future. We shall recur to the subject of astrology when we come to
speak of the moral and religious character of the people.
The Church treated this and other pseudo-sciences nearly always with
toleration; and showed itself actually hostile even to genuine science
only when a charge of heresy together with necromancy was also in
question--which certainly was often the case. A point which it would be
interesting to decide is this: whether and in what cases the Dominican
(and also the Franciscan) Inquisitors in Italy were conscious of the
falsehood of the charges, and yet condemned the accused, either to
oblige some enemy of the prisoner or from hatred to natural science,
and particularly to experiments. The latter doubtless occurred, but it
is not easy to prove the fact. What helped to cause such persecutions
in the North, namely, the opposition made to the innovators by the
upholders of the received official, scholastic system of nature, was of
little or no weight in Italy. Pietro of Abano, at the beginning of the
fourteenth century, is well known to have fallen a victim to the envy
of another physician, who accused him before the Inquisition of heresy
and magic; and something of the same kind may have happened in the case
of his Paduan contemporary, Giovannino Sanguinacci, who was known as an
innovator in medical practice. He escaped, however, with banishment.
Nor must it be forgotten that the inquisitorial power of the Dominicans
was exercised less uniformly in Italy than in the North. Tyrants and
free cities in the fourteenth century treated the clergy at times with
such sovereign contempt that very different matters from natural
science went unpunished. But when, with the fifteenth century,
antiquity became the leading power in Italy, the breach it made in the
old system was turned to account by every branch of secular science.
Humanism, nevertheless, attracted to itself the best strength of the
nation, and thereby, no doubt, did injury to the inductive
investigation of nature. Here and there the Inquisition suddenly
started into life, and punished or burned physicians as blasphemers or
magicians. In such cases it is hard to discover what was the true
motive underlying the condemnation. But even so, Italy, at the close of
the fifteenth century, with Paolo Toscanelli, Luca Pacioli and Leonardo
da Vinci, held incomparably the highest place among European nations in
mathematics and the natural sciences, and the learned men of every
country, even Regiomontanus and Copernicus, confessed themselves its
pupils. This glory survived the Counter-reformation, and even today the
Italians would occupy the first place in this respect if circumstances
had not made it impossible for the greatest minds to devote themselves
to tranquil research.
A significant proof of the widespread interest in natural history is
found in the zeal which showed itself at an early period for the
collection and comparative study of plants and animals. Italy claims to
be the first creator of botanical gar dens, though possibly they may
have served a chiefly practical end, and the claim to priority may be
itself disputed. It is of far greater importance that princes and
wealthy men, in laying out their pleasure-gardens, instinctively made a
point of collecting the greatest possible number of different plants in
all their species and varieties. Thus in the fifteenth century the
noble grounds of the Medicean Villa Careggi appear from the
descriptions we have of them to have been almost a botanical garden,
with countless specimens of different trees and shrubs. Of the same
kind was a villa of the Cardinal Trivulzio, at the beginning of the
sixteenth century, in the Roman Campagna towards Tivoli, with hedges
made up of various species of roses, with trees of every description--the
fruit-trees especially showing an astonishing variety--with twenty
different sorts of vines and a large kitchen-garden. This is evidently
something very different from the score or two of familiar medicinal
plants which were to be found in the garden of any castle or monastery
in Western Europe. Along with a careful cultivation of fruit for the
purposes of the table, we find an interest in the plant for its own
sake, on account of the pleasure it gives to the eye. We learn from the
history of art at how late a period this passion for botanical
collections was laid aside, and gave place to what was considered the
picturesque style of landscape-gardening.
The collections, too, of foreign animals not only gratified curiosity,
but served also the higher purposes of observation. The facility of
transport from the southern and eastern harbors of the Mediterranean,
and the mildness of the Italian climate, made it practicable to buy the
largest animals of the south, or to accept them as presents from the
Sultans. The cities and princes were especially anxious to keep live
lions even where a lion was not, as in Florence, the emblem of the
State. The lions' den was generally in or near the government palace,
as in Perugia and Florence; in Rome, it lay on the slope of the
Capitol. The beasts sometimes served as executioners of political
judgements, and no doubt, apart from this, they kept alive a certain
terror in the popular mind. Their condition was also held to be ominous
of good or evil. Their fertility, especially, was considered a sign of
public prosperity, and no less a man than Giovanni Villani thought it
worth recording that he was present at the delivery of a lioness. The
cubs were often given to allied States and princes, or to Condottieri
as a reward of their valor. In addition to the lions, the Florentines
began very early to keep leopards, for which a special keeper was
appointed. Borso of Ferrara used to set his lion to fight with bulls,
bears, and wild boars.
By the end of the fifteenth century, however, true menageries
(serragli), now reckoned part of the suitable appointments of a court,
were kept by many of the princes. 'It belongs to the position of the
great,' says Matarazzo, 'to keep horses, dogs, mules, falcons, and
other birds, court-jesters, singers, and foreign animals.' The
menagerie at Naples, in the time of Ferrante, contained even a giraffe
and a zebra, presented, it seems, by the ruler of Baghdad. Filippo
Maria Visconti possessed not only horses which cost him each 500 or
1,000 pieces of gold, and valuable English dogs, but a number of
leopards brought from all parts of the East; the expense of his hunting
birds, which were collected from the countries of Northern Europe,
amounted to 3,000 pieces of gold a month. King Emanuel the Great of
Portugal knew well what he was about when he presented Leo X with an
elephant and a rhinoceros. It was under such circumstances that the
foundations of a scientific zoology and botany were laid.
A practical fruit of these zoological studies was the establishment of
studs, of which the Mantuan, under Francesco Gonzaga, was esteemed the
first in Europe. All interest in, and knowledge of the different breeds
of horses is as old, no doubt, as riding itself, and the crossing of
the European with the Asiatic must have been common from the time of
the Crusades. In Italy, a special inducement to perfect the breed was
offered by the prizes at the horse-races held in every considerable
town in the peninsula. In the Mantuan stables were found the infallible
winners in these contests, as well as the best military
chargers, and the horses best suited by their stately appearance for
presents to great people. Gonzaga kept stallions and mares from Spain,
Ireland, Africa, Thrace, and Cilicia, and for the sake of the last he
cultivated the friendship of the Sultans. All possible experiments were
here tried, in order to produce the most perfect animals.
Even human menageries were not wanting. The famous Cardinal Ippolito
Medici, bastard of Giuliano, Duke of Nemours, kept at his strange court
a troop of barbarians who talked no less than twenty different
languages, and who were all of them perfect specimens of their races.
Among them were incomparable voltigeurs of the best blood of the
North African Moors, Tartar bowmen, Negro wrestlers, Indian divers, and
Turks, who generally accompanied the Cardinal on his hunting
expeditions. When he was overtaken by an early death (1535), this
motley band carried the corpse on their shoulders from Itri to Rome,
and mingled with the general mourning for the open-handed Cardinal
their medley of tongues and violent gesticulations.
These scattered notices of the relations of the Italians to natural
science, and their interest in the wealth and variety of the products
of nature, are only fragments of a great subject. No one is more
conscious than the author of the defects in his knowledge on this
point. Of the multitude of special works in which the subject is
adequately treated, even the names are but imperfectly known to him.