Laurel E. Radwin, Ph.D., RN, CSOPPQNCS© The Oncology Patients’ Perception of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale |
|
Curriculum
Vitae Teaching Publications Research OPPQNCS© Home |
|
OPPQNCS© Links
Introduction
|
Psychometric
Properties
Construct
Validity
Construct
validity of the original 45-item OPPQNCS was examined with a principal
component method of exploratory factor analysis. Inasmuch as the eight dimensions of the attributes of high
quality nursing care were thought to be interrelated, a promax (oblique)
rotation was conducted (SPSS for Windows Version 10.0). The principal components analysis (PCA) revealed
that four factors accounted for 80.5% of the variance. A forced four-factor solution indicated
that 41 of the 45 items should be retained.
Two of the 45 items were deleted on the first rotation because they
did not meet the factor loading criterion of
> 0.4; two other items were eliminated because they loaded
ambiguously on more than one factor (Dixon, 2001). The 41 items were again analyzed using PCA and promax rotation,
and one additional item was deleted because the factor loading was <
0.4. The remaining 40 items met all
criteria when a third promax rotation was performed. The four factors represented four
interpersonal nursing interventions that comprise patient centered care:
responsiveness, individualization, proficiency, and coordination Reliability Estimation
LONG VERSION: A forty-item long form of the OPPQNCS© was created. Internal consistency reliability of the OPPQNCS was assessed
using coefficient alpha. Coefficient
alpha of the total 40 item scale was 0.99.
The coefficient alpha for the responsiveness subscale was 0.99
(22 items); for the individualization subscale, 0.97 (10 items); for
the coordination subscale, 0.87 (3 items), and for the proficiency
subscale, 0.95 (5 items). “Alpha
if item removed” statistics indicated that removal of any item would result
in a lower alpha for the relevant subscale. SHORT VERSION: An 18-item short form was created using stepwise regression. Coefficient alpha of the total 18 item
short form was 0.97; 0.95 for the responsiveness subscale (5 items); 0.93 for
the individualization subscale (5 items), 0.87 for the coordination subscale
(3 items); and 0.95 for the proficiency subscale (5 items). “Alpha if item removed” statistics
indicated that removal of any item would result in a lower alpha for the
relevant subscale. |