One thing I appreciated |
One thing to be developed further (either by speaker or by the person writing) |
Visual schemes |
|
Approach regarding study of phenomena by different sciences & workshop ideas regarding flexible engagement/transversal engagement |
More examples to illustrate conceptual framework |
Vision of interdependence between several areas and actions with related time lines |
From myself, more relationship with research process and the environment |
Leitmotiv of presentation evolved from a single standpoint that is a common concern; there was a close interaction with the audience's situation |
Make the logic of the vignettes less diffuse and easier to follow the reasoning |
Historical lines of evolution of American [Méxican?] socio-ecology as example for action |
In refractive practice diagram light has to be broken by non-parallel surfaces to break up light into spectral order |
Challenging presentation; ambitious, but well-organized |
Apply this knowledge to social science. Concerning the object of analysis, knowledge, ask What is knowledge? |
The form of the presentation, linking the ideas and the methodology of presenting |
Connection between the themes and the experience of emeaicão? of the thesis |
Continuous finding of news ways of developing and diversifying work |
Where the rethinking of my path of research might, or might not, lead me—must that be a permanent position? |
Very interesting presentation |
Change my way of thinking about my PhD—I will have to think much more and do much more research |
We should not take things for granted, evolution is constant and deserves more attention |
|
Sharing impressions about one's personal research path. |
Work on the question, “How difficult is it to modify established knowledge and practices |
Some slides, simple ones, with just a sentence or thought were great to keep my attention |
Spaghetti slides were confusing from the back |
Intersecting processes of any change |
Difference between refractive and diffractive practice |
Some of the people who attend the workshops develop insights about themselves and their work |
How the insights are applied after the workshops |
Maps of complexity and intersecting levels |
More on refractive practice |
Emphasis on flexibility |
More practical examples |
Opening the mind reflection about flexible engagement |
Middle part of refractive practice |
Lesson on complexity |
How to conceptualize the notion of the border within tis framework |
Freewriting exercise—would like to know more about it. The approach to reflexivity. |
What about external pressures that sometimes prevents us changing? Risk factors that may curb creativity. |
The original approach. |
Turn “these ideas” into a practical exercise, so we experienced transversal engagement in the moment. Organize one of these workshops for us to participate in before leaving Portugal |
Quick discussion about local and translocal knowledge |
Expand discussion about transversal engagement |
Creativoity and new ways of dealing with knowledge and critical thinking. Really amazing! |
I am interested in developing further the topic of dealing with alternative knowledges and different possibilities of producing knowledge. (For example, how can I engage with the struggles, the pain and the knowledge produced by San Tomean female writers and the colonial history of the country with appropriating their voices? How do I deal with privileged memories?) |
Personal experience and the innovative character of the issues |
More well organized so that some slides were not confusing. More development of the ANT of Latour. |
Inter-action! |
|
Personal reference to the beginning of your research in Australia, explaining that you left too early and the reference to your grandfather. |
I have to develop as early as possible a plan for my PhD for the year ahead in order to try not to go too far from my origin and my concern to publish not only in academic terms. |
The concept of refractive practice and how it confers value to multi-pluri-trans-disciplinary paths and conversations |
How to identify major from minor elements of the intersections, i.e., stronger and weaker explanatory factors in what we study. Connect with network analysis. |
The moment of exposing: how can we acknowledge the perspectives of others to enrich our own, even though the fields of study are completely different |
More detailed explanation of the models so they are clear |
The ways that this presentation made me feel that every question and every work of interest have value |
More elaboration of the idea of daily writing |
The use of the complexity of ecological, social, and economic aspects of our world with a focus on the role of knowledge production and collaboration in possible ways to deal with complexity |
Deepen the examples to clarify the possibilities for collaboration |
Stimulating reflective practice and interdisciplinarity |
Develop this reflection and intensity |
The concept of engagement |
Presentation of studies in areas that involve multiple foci such as health and political economy |
Refractive practice |
Future consequences |
The possibility to think in a new way, a more complex way |
My difficulty in participating in the freewriting exercise |
The presentation tried to address the difficulties of managing research as researchers experience it so as to help understand and look back on pathways of research |
I am not sure I understood the presentation correctly and would need more examples, such as the one on your personal history, to consider the philosophical issues involved. |