Matchett, William H. The Phoenix and the Turtle. The Hague: Mouton, 1965.

(excerpted by Clifford Stetner)

 

18

To see ‘The Phoenix and the Turtle’ merely as an example of Platonism, the Court of Love, mysticism, the parliament of birds, or the legend of the phoenix--though all of these traditions are relevant--does not explain, and may distort, the individual organization of the particular poem.

 

... to decide too quickly that the poem is an allegory of Essex and Elizabeth, Shakespeare and Southampton, the poet and his art, the body and the soul, Christ and the Church, the death of Marlowe, the marriage of Sir John Salusbury or that of Lucy, Countess of Bedford, leads inevitably to a combination of ingenuity and blindness...

 

20

We must turn to the poets...directly to their use of the word ‘phoenix,’ which had come to have one connotation overshadowing all others...come to be the most fitting compliment for anyone who was considered the most splendid or most rare of his kind...emblematic...way of speaking only of the most rare one’

 

Fairchild...’phoenix’ had become a descriptive term which was applied to any person or thing regarded as possessing unique excellence;...synonym for ‘paragon’, ‘distinguished,’ or ‘wonderful’

 

 

22

Rollins...’But the mythical bird of Arabia has been more or less of a commonplace in English poetry since the eighth or ninth century, when an anonymous Anglo-Saxon poet translated Lactantius’s Phoenix as an allegory of Christ.’

 

23

...frequent use in reference to Queen Elizabeth

 

 25

Henry VI plays we twice find the phoenix as a revenging successor rising form the ashes of the dead...(1HenryVI, IV, vii, 92-3) ... (3HenryVI, I, iv, 35-6)

 

In six later plays, the bird...is an emblem of rarity or splendor...(AYLI, IV, iii, 16-17)...(All’s Well, I, i, 171-4)...(Timon, II, i, 31-2) ... (Antony, III, ii, 11-12)...(Cymbeline, I, vi, 16-17)...(Tempest, III, iii, 21-4)...

 

In two passages the key word is ‘rare,’ and in one it is ‘nonpareil.’ In Timon the reference, with ‘flashes,’ is apparently to splendor.  In AW, although the reference is somewhat ambiguous, rarity of beauty is in better accord with the context than are any details of the legends.  In the Tempest, the unique phoenix is, like the unicorn, an unbelievable creature.-- In COE, ‘Phoenix’ is the name of an inn (I, ii,75) and, in Twelfth Night, of a boat (V, i, 61)

 

In Henry VIII...

Cranmer prophesying at Elizabeth’s birth:

Nor shall this peace sleep with her; but as when

The bird of wonder dies, the maiden phoenix,

As great in admiration as herself,

So shall she leave her blessedness to one,-

When heaven shall call her from this cloud of darkness,-

Shall star-like rise, as great in frame as she was,

And so stand fix’d.

 

27

Sonnet xix

Devouring Time, blunt thou the lion’s paws,

And make the earth devour her own sweet brood;

Pluck the keen teeth from the fierce tiger’s jaws

And burn the long-liv’d phoenix in her blood...

 

Donne...Epithalamion... ’these two Phenixes’ who, by becoming one, restore nature

 

28

Henry Lytte...The Light of Britayne (1588)...Elizabeth is ‘by the grace of God: The Phoenix of the worlde:  The Angell of Englande

 

Frances Yates...’to her Phoenix motto of semper eadem’...(1578)

 

‘Phoenix Jewel,’ which is a gold and enamel medallion showing a profile of the Queen on one side and a phoenix in flames on the other.

 

Elizabeth was the phoenix because she was...unique

 

29

‘phoenix’ in Elizabethan poetry was used primarily as an emblem for uniqueness, rarity, beauty or splendor, and did not necessarily imply any further details of the traditional phoenix legends, although such details might be brought in  when they served the purposes of an individual poem

 

William Fennor...Descriptions (1616)

England’s fair Phoenix, Europe’s admiration

Of matchlesse beauty, yet of vertue rare;

A kindgome’s comfortable consolation,

Who ever rarest is, yet she is rarer.

 

23 uses of the phoenix in relation only to ‘its rareness,’ and twelve in relation to ‘its self-immolation and resurrection.’ Animal Conventions in English Renaissance Non-Religious Prose (1560-1600) WM Carroll...

 

CHAPTER 6

‘THE PHOENIX AND THE TURTLE’

II: THE POEM IN CONTEXT

 

187

Appearing as it did in Loues Martyr, Shakespeare’s poem necessarily made a statement about Essex and the Queen [as Grosart suggests, but not only a statement of praise]

 

188

conforms to certain standards...other appended poems...deals with a Phoenix and Turtle.  Less obvious, though also standard, are the basic structure of paired poems and the Platonic terminology....confirms his participation...in a general plan...

 

Chaucer’s The Parlement of Foules, Matthew Roydon’s elegy on sir Phillip Sidney, Lactantius and Ovid have all been suggested as Shakespeare source for PT...

 

Roydon’s is the most relevant...

 

...use of the phrase ‘the Phoenix nest’ has been taken to imply his remembering the volume in which it first appeared.

 

Nicholas Breton’sAmoris Lachrimae” (1591)

 

The Nightingale is stopped in her throte,

And shriking Owles do make a fearefull noise,

The dolefull Ravens sing a deadly note

And little Wrennes the end of Eagles ioyes:

The Phoenix dreepes, and falcons beate their wings,

To heare how Swans of death and sorrow sings (1591, B).

 

190

The most that we could say he borrowed from Roydon’s poem would be the general conception of assembling birds for lamentation and the inclusion in the group of an eagle and a swan--and he would not have had to go to Roydon for this conventional conception.

 

Breton’s poem, however, could have provided him not only with these same suggestions but with others,...a few of them quite specific.

 

...emphasizing the voices of the birds...

 

 ‘the bird of loudest lay’ is like a specific rejection of Breton’s nightingale, ‘stopped n her throte.’

 

shriking harbinger’ improves on Breton’s ‘shriking Owles’ rhythmically

 

breton’s poem...as in The Phoenix nest...we find the figure of Reason:

 

Oh what a wo it is to see the woes

Where nought but wo is left to looke upon,

A griefe too great for reason to disclose,

And in effect a death to studie on

 

191

Breton’s Reason, like his nightingale, is mute; Shakespeare regains its voice.

 

...source for the opening stanzas of PT, I would think that not Chaucer or Ovid, certainly not Lactantius, and not even Roydon, but Nicholas Breton wrote the poem which exerted the most direct influence

 

The idea that Elizabeth and Essex were Shakespeare Phoenix and Turtle--a fact which the poem’s context forces us to recognize--meets resistance primarily because Elizabeth was unquestionably alive at the time of the publication of this poem purporting to commemorate her death.

 

192

One who had hoped for great things from Essex would not have had to wait for the fact of death before losing his hopes...

 

...when Shakespeare lost faith in Essex, we cannot say.  I have tended to relate the changes to the actual rebellion, on the basis of the internal chronological evidence in Loues martyr

 

Shakespeare sees the situation as already past redeeming

 

193

...specific unsolved problem implied by the poem, the problem, that is, of the succession...

 

Though the queen lived on, in losing Essex she had, it might be thought, lost her future.

 

As we have seen, it was probably part of Shakespeare assignment that he deal with the PT in Platonic terms

 

194

The relationship of the Phoenix and the Turtle is praised through the intellectual game of extending, as though they were literal truths, the common Platonic metaphors of love.

 

...conveys an effect of the self-conscious construction of praise

 

Shakespeare had good reason to feel that praise, in specifically Platonic terms, was required; he had equally good reason to wish to modify that praise.

 

Though the mutual love of the Phoenix and the Turtle is eulogized, I would take such terms to have been imposed by Loues Martyr.  Shakespeare subject is not, I suggest, the supposed personal love of Elizabeth and Essex, but the mutual understanding which, it had been hoped, would  make Essex the queen’s copartner in governing the country and determining the succession.

 

‘Threnos,’ stanzaically separate, actually conceived as an individual poem for which the earlier stanzas area introduction is Reason’s response to the claims made in the anthem; it is, presumably, Shakespeare’s response to the disgrace of Essex

 

195

These qualities were involved in  the relationship; they existed, but they are past redeeming

 

...nothing would be gained by seeking to blame either of the principals

 

...understanding of Essex and the queen, from which England had reason to expect such benefit.

 

...has come to a fruitless conclusion

 

...if Elizabeth and Essex have failed England, the highest values have themselves been involved in the loss, the result is not a total devastation.

 

...however the Platonic metaphors of praise may be assigned, they remain metaphors, and Reason recognizes that others partake of the qualities supposedly lost

 

196

...for all their glory, the Phoenix and the Turtle are now ‘dead birds,’ and the living will soon become reconciled to going on without.

 

suspect that Shakespeare, whatever his former partisanship, would have viewed the Essex rebellion with horror and would, by 1601, consider Elizabeth, whatever her undeniable glories, a failure in her supreme duty as a Queen.

 

The history plays are built around two basic political assumptions: that sedition is never justified and that England was in dire trouble whenever the succession was in doubt....long continuance of the resulting Tudor line.  the line, and hence presumably peace, would expire with Elizabeth.

 

197

Reason’s struggle to assert itself in spite of emotional involvement is reminiscent of the ambivalence in Sonnets 137 and 138, in which, for the sake of ‘love ; the poet denies his reason

 

‘The Phoenix and the Turtle represents Reason as reasserting itself after a tragic loss.

 

198

‘beauty’ and truth,’ ‘fair’ and ‘true’ are, indeed, thematic words in the Sonnets, and not alone for the pretense of the lady.  the young man, like the relationship of the Phoenix and the turtle, is said to embody the Platonic ideas - “both truth and beauty on my loue depends’ (sonnet 101) - which will expire when he does - ‘Thy end is Truthes and Beauties doome and date’ (Sonnet 14)

 

The word ‘rarity,’ proper to the Loues martyr context as the quality of he phoenix itself, appears onoy once in the sonnets, where ..it is associated with 'beauty’ and ‘truth’

 

Time doth transfixe the florish set on youth,

and delues the paralels on beauties brow,

Feedes on the rarities of natures truth,

And nothing stands but for his sieth to mow (Sonnet 60)

 

Venus in her wooing of Adonis:

 

therefore despight of fruitlesse chastitie,

loue-lacking vestals, and selfe-louing Nuns,

That ont he earth would breed a scarcitie,

And barraine dearth of daughters, and of suns;

  Be prodigall, the lampe that burnes by night,

  Dreies up his oyle, to lend the world his light

 

What is thy bodie but a swalowing graue,

Seeming to burie tha posteritie.

which by the rihgts of time thou needs must haue,

If thou destroy them not in dare obscuritie?

  If so the world, will hold thee in disdaine,

 Sith in thy pride, so faire a hope is slaine (11. 751-62)

 

200

Shakespeare, in his use of platonic imagery in Pt first establishes a triumph worthy of praise, but ultimately  undercuts that triumph by asserting reason’s reluctant rejection of it

 

Having already praised the young man in the sonnets as the sole embodiment of Platonic ideas

 

Whether or not Shakespeare was led to examine the language of Platonism only in order to express an appraisal of the phoenix and the turtle, the effect of his poem is that of rejecting also the very idea of Platonic love.  Whatever its triumph, ‘married Chastity’ is not a state of which reason can approve.

 

Through the introduction of Reason, Shakespeare devalues the Platonic metaphor of the anthem.  the possible emotional truth of any metaphor may be converted into undoubted nonsense merely by treating that metaphor as though it were a statement of literal fact.

 

...his commitment to poetry is not in doubt.

 

201

After a final statement of the loss in terms of the Platonic metaphors of praise --:truth and Beautie buried be--reason moderates not only the triumph but even the tragedy by reminding us that ins spite of the magnitude of the loss, the world is not bereft of all that can be considered ‘true or faire.’  Elizabeth and Essex--she formerly a phoenix in the rarity of her glory, he a turtle in his single-minded loyalty--are now ‘these dead birds’...

 

The world has not come to an end...

 

...others of he group of poets whose work was appended to Loues Martyr did not agree.

 

That he was not without his own commitments is shown by Reason’s struggle in the poem.

 

To reduce any complex work of art to a single statement said to be its ‘meaning’ is, of course, to distort and cheapen it.

 

...original reading of the poem in which the historical context played no part.  My close textual analysis led me to disagree with the multitude of critics who, however they differed among themselves as to ho or what were being praised, concurred in assuming that praise was the ultimate object of the poem.