Dionysus and Heracles in Scythia: The Eschatological String of Herodotus, Book 4

Herodotus

Dionysus and Heracles in Scythia
The Eschatological String of Herodotus Book 4

by George Hinge

1. The mysteries of Dionysus and the Mother and the teachings of the Pythagoreans play a crucial role in Herodotus’ Histories in general and in the Scythian logos in particular. The mysteries are, however, not referred to overtly, but concealed in disparate details in the narrative. It will be the ambition of the present article[1] to combine these details into a complete and coherent picture. I shall argue that Herodotus Book 4 is pervaded by an “eschatological ideology” which shall illustrate the fundamental difference between the nomadic Scythian culture and the Greek civilisation.

An often-quoted testimony to Dionysiac cult in the Greek colony of Olbia is Herodotus’ tragic story of the Scythian king Scyles (4.78-80). He had a Greek mother, was fond of Greek customs and stayed for a month or more a year in Olbia. He kept a house and a wife in the city. Eventually, he chose to be initiated into the mysteries of Dionysus Baccheios. The story is presented as an illustration of the reservations of the Scythians towards Greek culture.[2] Accordingly, when the Scythians learn what their king is doing behind the walls of Olbia, Scyles is forced to escape to Thrace, only to be rendered back and executed. Herodotus is not particularly precise as to the nature of the initiation, but I shall try to substantiate that Scyles was initiated into Dionysiac mysteries of the so-called Orphic type, which was popular in many parts of the Greek world in the Classical age. A couple of inscriptions have been discovered that document the existence of these mysteries in Olbia. The most interesting – and most often referred to – are three bone tablets carrying the following inscriptions:

SEG 28.659 βίος. θάνατος. βίος. ἀλήθεια. Ζα(γρεύς). Διό(νυσος) “Life. Death. Life. Truth. Za(greus?). Dio(nysos). Orphics”
SEG 28.660 εἰρήνη. πόλεμος. ἀλήθεια. ψεῦδος. Διόν(υσος) “Peace. War. Truth. Lie. Dion(ysos)”
SEG 28.661 Διόν(υσος). ἀλήθεια. σῶμα. ψυχή “Dion(ysos). Truth. Body. Soul.”

Even though it is anything but evident what was the actual function of these tablets they send a clear message: Life ends with death, but after that a new life begins. Furthermore, this belief in an afterlife is associated explicitly with Dionysus and the Orphics. The popularity of Orphic beliefs in the northern Black Sea area is supported by other inscriptions from Olbia.[3] A bronze mirror dated to ca. 500 BC carrying a Dionysiac inscription[4] reflects without doubt the Orphic myth of Dionysus’ death, according to which the god looked at himself in a mirror when he was attacked by the Titans (cf. Orph. fr. 209 Kern). A fragment of a black-glazed cylix found in Olbia carries the very beginning of Odysseus’ own tale in the Odyssey (9.39): Ἰλιό[θεν] με φ[έρων] ἄνεμ[ος Κικ]όνεσσι [πέλ]ασσεν “a wind brought me from Troy to the Ciconians” (= SEG 30.933); given that the concept of the wind carrying the soul to and fro was ascribed to Orpheus (Arist., De an. 410^b = Orph. fr. 27 Kern), and the Thracian Ciconians and their king Ismarus were connected not only with wine (Od. 9.196-7, Archil. fr. 2.2), but also with Dionysus (cf. Ps.-Hes., fr. 238), the inscription may be yet another testimony to the character of the Olbian cult of Dionysus.[5] I would like to see Orphic beliefs in later inscriptions from Panticapaeum as well: e.g. CIRB 117 (3^rd cent. BC): the deceased breaths Lenaeos;[6] CIRB 119 (2^nd/1^st cent. BC): killed in battle, the deceased will go, not to Hades, but to the land of heroes; CIRB 121 (1^st cent. BC): the deceased has escaped the wheel of calamities.[7]

We are in a rather controversial area of Classical studies. The label of Orphism is ambiguous in antiquity, and one cannot point out a single Orphic doctrine or school like, say, the Pythagorean, Platonic or Aristotelian schools (which are not, of course, uniform either). The mythical name of “Orpheus” was rather a seal of approval given to writings belonging to diverse intellectual movements. These obligatory reservations being stated, it must be admitted that both in Classical and Hellenistic times there were in fact religious societies which have to be called and were called “Orphic”.[8] The Olbian bone tablets are an important testimony to that. Furthermore, the existence of an Orphic-Dionysiac cult is confirmed by gold leaves found in graves from South Italy, Crete and Thessaly dating to the Classical and Hellenistic periods. They give instructions to the deceased of what he or she is going to do when he or she enters Hades, and we learn of two different ends: the ordinary souls live in the forgetful darkness of Hades, whereas the souls of the initiates drink of the Lake of Memory and come to another, more joyful place.[9] In a gold leaf found in Hipponion (= Pugliese Carratelli I A 1), the initiates are called mystai kai bacchoi, which demonstrates beyond doubt that Dionysus played a main role in the ritual. Two gold leaves found in Pelinna in Thessaly (II B 3+4, 4^th cent. BC) start with these verses:

νῦν ἔθανες καὶ νῦν ἐγένου, τρισόλβιε, ἄματι τῶιδε.
εἰπεῖν Φερσεφόναι σ’ ὅτι Βάκχιος αὐτὸς ἔλυσε

“Now you have died, and now you are born, three times blessed, on this very day. Say to Persephone that it is Bacchius himself that has redeemed you.”

They express the same line of thought as the Olbian bone plates, only more explicitly.[10]

2. However, even if there can be no doubt that Orphic-Dionysiac cults and beliefs did exist in the fifth century in various places in the Greek world including Olbia, it does not follow that Herodotus has such beliefs in mind in the Scyles story. After all, Herodotus does not mention the Orphics explicitly, nor does he describe the Dionysiac mysteries. Scyles is initiated into as some kind of preparation for a more blessed afterlife. His description of the ritual is, if anything, pictured as a wild bacchanal. The keyword is “madness” expressed in the Greek verb mainesthai occurring twice in chapter 79: in the description of the Scythians’ general prejudice towards Bacchic cult (οὐ γάρ φασι οἰκὸς εἶναι ἐξευρίσκειν τοῦτον, ὅστις μαίνεσθαι ἐνάγει ἀνθρώπους) and in the Greeks’ gossip about Scyles’ initiation (νῦν οὗτος ὁ δαίμων καὶ τὸν ὑμέτερον βασιλέα λελάβηκε, καὶ βακχεύει τε καὶ ὑπὸ τοῦ θεοῦ μαίνεται).[11] In general Dionysus Baccheius is associated with ecstatic rituals.[12] Since Olbia was a colony of Miletus (as it is stated in the Scyles story: 4.78.3), it is natural to compare Scyles’ mysteries with the Milesian sacred law for the cult of Dionysius Bacchius (LSAM 48, 276/5 BC). It speaks about a ritual called ōmophagion, i.e. “eating of raw meat”. Euripides’ tragedy Bacchae also mentions the ritual of eating raw meat (v. 139). It is furthermore reflected in Dionysus’ epicleses Ōmostēs (Alcaeus, fr. 129.9 V) and Ōmadios (Hymn.Orph. 30.5). The ritual is about leaving civilisation, killing with one’s bare hands and eating raw meat, a total regression to the animalistic stage. This regression is not an arrangement which serves only to give the participants a breath of wild air in the daily round.[13] It is a rite of transgression in which the temporary bestiality is supposed to lead to a more sober and civilised life-style. In this analysis, the Bacchanals and the Orphic Dionysus mysteries are two sides of the same coin. Thus, Scyles’ ritual madness does not exclude that his initiation is about redemption in the afterlife. The link between Bacchantic fury and salvation is also suggested by the description in Euripides’ Cretes (fr. 79 Austin), even if there seems to be some kind of syncresis of Dionysiac and Curetan rituals:[14]

ἁγνὸν δὲ βίον τείνων ἐξ οὗ
Διὸς Ἰδαίου μύστης γενόμην,
καὶ νυκτιπόλου Ζαγρέως βροντὰς
τοὺς ὠμοφάγους δαίτας τελέσας
μητρί τ᾽ ὀρείῳ δᾷδας ἀνασχὼν
καὶ κουρήτων
βάκχος ἐκλήθην ὁσιωθείς.

“It is a pure life I have since I have become initiate of the Idaean Zeus and herdsman of nocturnal Zagreus [Dionysus]; after I have celebrated the dinners of raw meat and raised the torches for the Mother in the mountains with the Curetes, I have been sanctified and have acquired the name Bacchant”

These ideas rest[15] on a special Orphic mythology and cosmogony different from the classic one presented by Hesiod in the Theogony. For a long time, our comprehension of the Orphic mythology relied mainly on late authors like Athenagoras and Damascius – supplied with scattered allusions in Classical and Hellenistic authors. That this mythology existed in Classical times already is testified by the Derveni papyrus, even if the extant parts do not mention Dionysus. So, we have to rely on references in the later sources anyway. The Latin author Firmicus Maternus gives this account of the Orphic Dionysus myth (Err.prof.rel. 9 = Orph. fr. 214 Kern; my paraphrase):

The Cretan tyrant Jupiter [Zeus] had an illegitimate son, Liber [Dionysus]. He put him on his throne, though he was still a boy. His jealous wife Juno [Hera] had her servants, the Titans, attack him. They fooled him with rattles and a mirror, killed him, cut him and cooked the pieces. His sister Minerva [Athena] rescued the heart and brought it to their father, who got furious and killed the Titans. He made a gypsum statuette, in which he inserted Liber’s heart, and put it in a temple, where the boy’s pedagogue Silenus served as a priest. To mitigate their tyrant, the Cretans celebrate each year a festival and every second year mysteries, during which they revive Liber’s passions. They tear a living ox with their teeth and run about screaming and acting as if they were mad (fingunt animi furentis insaniam) in the woods, and they carry with them the basket, in which Minerva hid Liber’s heart.

Firmicus Maternus is a Christian author of the fourth century AD. The general outline of the myth is, however, much older. Thus, Euphorion (fr. 13 Powell) and Callimachus (fr. 643 Pfeiffer) refer to the cooking of Dionysus. What makes Firmicus’ testimony interesting in this context is the fact that he associates the Dionysiac mania and ōmophagia with the specifically Orphic mythology about Dionysus’ death and resurrection. He calls the séances during which the passions of Dionysus are re-performed trieterica consecratio. A trietēris festival is commemorated in Classical sources too (e.g. Hymn.Hom.Dion. 1.11; Eur., Bacch. 133),[16] and it is associated with the cult of Dionysus Baccheius in the above-mentioned Milesian sacred law.[17] Herodotus informs that the Geloni, living north of the Scythians, “celebrate a trietēris festival for Dionysus and are Bacchants” (4.108). Since he wants to emphasise that the Geloni are not nomadic Scythians, he may very well be thinking of the same sort of mysteries into which Scyles was initiated some pages earlier; it is at any rate important that these Bacchanals are seen as a condicio sine qua non of agricultural civilisation. In Euripides’ Bacchae, Pentheus, who refuses to believe in Dionysus, is torn by wild Bacchants. It is a mythical staging of the trietēris ritual, with a real man as the victim instead of a bull or some other animal. The staragmos, or “tearing” (Bacch. 735, 1127), was considered a reminiscence of the god’s own end.[18] The participants are called Bacchoi or Bacchai; by submitting themselves to a (ritual) death and resurrection, they have become identical to the god himself. This conception is implied by the text of the gold leaves, of which some say (II A 1; similarly ΙΙ Α 2, II B 1; cf. also II C 2):

καὶ γὰρ ἐγὼ ὑμῶν γένος εὔχομαι ὄλβιον εἶναι.
ποινὰν δ’ ἀνταπέτεισ’ ἔργων ἕνεκα οὔτι δικαίων,
εἴτε με Μοῖρα ἐδαμάσατο εἴτε Ἀστεροπῆτα κεραυνῶν.
νῦν δ’ ἱκέτις ἥκω παρ’ ἁγνὴν Φερσεφόνεαν
ὥς με πρόφρων πέμψηι ἕδρας ἐς εὐαγέων

“For I can also boast that I belong to your blessed stock. I have paid the penalty for the unjust deeds, whether Fate or the Lightener have suppressed me. Now, I come as a supplicant to Persephone, in order that she sends me to the seats of the pure”.

3. The myth of the murder of Dionysus was known to Herodotus. Even if he does not mention it explicitly, it is evident from his treatment of the Egyptian religion. As many others, he identified Dionysus with Osiris, who was killed by Seth and cut to pieces, but his mother Isis, identified with the Greek Demeter, brought the pieces together and embalmed him. Herodotus does not tell that myth either, but he alludes to it when he tells that Apollo / Horus, son of Dionysus / Osiris was the last divine king of the Egyptians, the successor of Typhon / Seth (2.144, 2.156). Moreover, he touches it on several occasions, but says that it would not be right (οὐκ ὅσιον) to go into details:

2.48.3 (about phallagogy) “Why the private member is so huge and the only part of the body that moves is told in a sacred tale.”

2.61.1 (about grievances at the festival for Isis in Saïs) “It is not right for me to say over whom they are grieving.”

2.86.2 (about different mummification packages offered by the undertakers) “... and the most expensive one carries the name of him whose name it would not be right for me to mention in this context...”

2.170-171 “There are also graves over him whose name it is not right to mention in this context, in Saïs in the sanctuary of Athena, behind the temple ... At this lake, they make representations of his sufferings at night, what the Egyptians call mysteries. Even though I know more about it and know all the details, I shall keep my mouth.”

Cf. also 2.47.2; 2.132.2.

It is evident that it is Osiris that is killed, cut to pieces and revived except for the penis. Herodotus is not restrained by some Egyptian pledge of secrecy. The details about the death of Osiris were well-known in Egypt and often described in details in Egyptian literature. His reservations are due to the fact that he identifies the Egyptian rituals with the Greek mystery cults.[19] Thus, it would have been an offence against Greek religious law to say straight out that the mysteries were about the death of Osiris alias Dionysus. The obligatory secrecy is characteristic of Greek mystery cults in general and of the Orphic movement in particular. The verse ἀείδω ξυνετοῖσι· θύρας δ᾿ ἐπίθεσθε βέβηλοι “I sing to those who know; the uninitiated must close the doors” (Orph. fr. 334 Kern; similarly frr. 245 and 247) is not only alluded to in Plato (Symp. 218^b), but also quoted, it seems, in the Derveni papyrus (col. IV). In an Orphic context, Pindar says that he has many arrows in his quiver that will speak to those who understand, or they will need interpretation (Ol. 2.84-86).[20] If we accept that Scyles’ initiation was in fact an initiation into Orphic-Dionysic mysteries, we have a good reason why Herodotus does not spell this point out either. He, too, writes for them who understand.

My hypothesis that Herodotus has an Orphic-Dionysiac ritual in mind is supported by an important detail in his narrative. When Scyles was ready for the initiation, a most powerful omen (φάσμα μέγιστον) occurred: “the god darted the thunderbolt upon his Olbian palace, and it burnt down; nevertheless, Scyles fulfilled his initiation” (4.79.1-2). Yet, to be struck by lightening is at the same time considered a divine way of passing away, a shortcut to immortality, so to speak.[21] The divinising death of Dionysus’ mother Semele was due to the thunderbolt of Zeus (Pind. Ol. 2.25-26; Diod.Sic. 5.52.2). According to one tradition, Orpheus was killed by lightening as well (Anth.Pal. 7.617 ~ Alcidamas, Ulixes 24). Heracles’ pyre was also hit by Zeus’ thunderbolt (Diod.Sic. 4.38.5). Several Orphic gold leaves speak about the deceased being suppressed by the “Lightener” (Pugliese Carratelli II A 1-2, B1 Ἀστεροπῆτα / Ἀστεροβλῆτα κεραυνῶν). I presume that the lightening omen is meant as a hint to the interpretation of the Scyles story – with the tragic contrast that Scyles is not divinised but killed by his own after an unsuccessful escape to the Thracians on the other side of the Danube. A little later in the Scythian logos, we are told that the Thracian tribe of the Getans - who live in the very same region - believes the soul to be immortal. It is, I think, no coincidence that Herodotus tells us that in their disrespect for other gods than Zalmoxis, the Getans shoot with their arrows against thunder and lightening (4.94.4).

Admittedly, the Orphic character of the initiation of Scyles is not mentioned directly and unequivocally, but it is supported by accumulative circumstantial evidence. As I shall demonstrate in the following sections of the paper, it is also supported by references to other kinds of eschatological beliefs and practices.

4. At the beginning of the fourth book, Herodotus presents three different explanations of the origin of the Scythian people: a Scythian myth, a Pontic Greek myth and a rationalist version. In the Greek myth, Heracles plays a central role. Returning from Erythia, Geryon’s “Red Island”, following a path around the disc of the earth, he finally comes to Hylaea in Scythia. A female monster steals his horses from him, and she refuses to give them back unless he goes in bed with her. She succeeds in holding him back in her cave long enough to get three sons with him, the eponym forefathers of the Scythians, Agathyrsians and Geloni.

The journey to Erythia is a kind of katabasis, a journey to the underworld. Geryon may be seen as a variant of Hades. He is three-headed like Cerberus (cf. Hes., Theog. 287), and just like Heracles must fetch the dog of Hades on a later occasion, so he kills Geryon’s dog Orthos. Of the canonical twelve labours of Heracles, the Geryonic cattle count as number ten, the apples of the Hesperids as number eleven, and Cerberus as number twelve,[22] and they are in a sense variants of the same story. The classic presentation of the Geryon story was the Geryoneid of Stesichorus, to which Herodotus possibly alludes in 4.8.1;[23] Stesichorus locates Erythia opposite the river of Tartessus in Spain (fr. 184 P.) and relates that Heracles travelled in the cup of Helios (fr. 185 P.).[24] It is understandable that the west, where the sun sets and “dies”, is at the same time the corner of the earth where one would locate the entrance to the land of the dead. The Pontic Greek myth about Heracles and the monstrous cave woman is only one among many stories about the hindrances confronting the hero on his return with the kine of Geryon. Other versions have other female monsters with whom Heracles has to sleep to get home with the cattle: e.g. Scylla (Schol. Lycophon, Alex. 46) and Celto / Celtine / Galate (Parth., Myth. 30; Diod.Sic. 5.24).[25] In most versions, Heracles travels through Italy (the name of which was derived from this very story[26]). What is more, Ephorus says that the entrance to Hades goes through the Lake Avernus near Cumae (cf. also Verg., Aen., Book 6), and the Cimmerians have an oracle there (FGrHist 70 F 134).

In the eleventh song of the Odyssey, Odysseus and his men come to the borders of the Oceanus. Here is, we are told, the people and city of the Cimmerians (Od. 11.14). Without doubt, Herodotus and all contemporary readers were familiar with these verses. When immediately after the Heracles story, in the third myth of origin, Herodotus tells that the Cimmerians were the aboriginal population in Scythia before the Scythians, the reader will get his point. According to the mythical geography – which Herodotus does not accept but may use for his purpose – if you go west to the Oceanus and follow the stream with the sun, you will eventually come to Scythia and Hylaea. The last hero with whom Odysseus speaks in the Nekyia is precisely Heracles (11.601-626) – or rather “his image – he was himself among the immortal gods” (εἴδωλον· αὐτὸς δὲ μετ᾽ ἀθανάτοισι θεοῖσι). Since the idea that the person was his soul conflicts with the opening of the Iliad (1.3-4), it was considered an interpolation already in antiquity.[27] The verses may have been used by Orphic itinerant preachers in Classical times already. At any rate, the mention of Heracles, the Cimmerians and the far west cannot but evoke associations with contemporary eschatological beliefs.

Heracles has in fact a prominent position in the Orphic cosmogonies. According to the summaries given in Athenagoras and Damascius, in the beginning, there was water and mud, but after that a winged three-headed snake was born; he was called Time (Χρόνος) or Heracles (= Orph. fr. 54 + 57 Kern). Martin L. West argues that Heracles’ place in the cosmogonic tradition is influenced by a stoic allegoric interpretation of the Heracles myth, according to which Heracles’ cremation on mount Oeta was identified with the ekpyrōsis (cf. Seneca, Ben. 4.8.1).[28] Nevertheless, it may still have some foundation in older cosmogonic beliefs. In Hesiod’s Theogony (vv. 270-336), Geryon is the great-nephew of a lady called Echidna, who is half woman and half snake just like the monster of the myth told in Herodotus. Herodotus even calls her an echidna; since the border between appellatives and proper names is fluent, the reader (and writer) would naturally identify the two. Hesiod’s Echidna lives together with Typhon – the Titan that murdered Dionysus according to the Orphic mythology. Hesiod informs that they had three children together: Orthus, the dog of Geryon, Cerberus, the dog of Hades, and the Hydra, all monsters with whom Heracles had to fight. Typhon is an alter ego of Geryon. Another variant is Cacus, the monster of the Aventine whom Heracles meets on his way home with the oxen (Verg., Aen. 8.185-275); he is at the same time a counterpart of Echidna (his feminine side is represented by his sister Caca).[29] Ophion – like Pherecydes’ Ophioneus an alter ego of Typhon - started a war against Zeus at Tartessus, i.e. at the same scene as Heracles’ battle against Geryon (Sch. Hom., Il. 8.479 Dindorf).

The Geryon myth has an unmistakable parallel in the Vedic story about the hero Trita Āptya, who killed the three-headed Viśvarūpa and stole his cattle (RV 10.8, 10.48), and in the Avestic story about Thraētaona killed the three-headed Aži Dahāka and obtained his two wives (Yt. 5.34), and it probably goes back to a common Indo-European myth.[30] The Typhon myth, on the other hand, has a striking parallel in the Hittite illuyankas myth. Since Typhon is in the Greek tradition located in a cave in Cilicia (Hom., Il. 2.783; Hes., Theog. 304; Pind., fr. 93), the myth is probably borrowed from the Hittite.[31] Both myths are cosmological dramas about the death and rebirth of the world and the change of seasons. It may have implied some eschatology too, the life of man and the life of the world being equated. Even though the core of the Geryon myth is most likely derived from a Proto-Indo-European model, there can be no doubt that the Greek variant was heavily influenced by Near Eastern mythology as well. We have already seen that Typhon was identified with the Egyptian Seth. Similarly Heracles was recognised as the Phoenician god Melqart, who had an important temple at Gibraltar; the Greek name “Pillars of Heracles” is probably due to Phoenician influence. Thus, the Geryon myth, which takes place just outside of Gibraltar, is possibly the result of a combination of Greek and Phoenician myths. Heracles’ apotheosis by the way of the pyre has parallels both in Tyre and Cilicia.[32] Herodotus is aware of these attempts of syncretism, even if he considers it wiser to distinguish the god Heracles from the hero Heracles (2.43-45). It is highly probable that Heracles’ labours were, or could be, interpreted cosmologically in Classical times already, even if we do not know if he was exploited by Orphic cosmogonies at that time, and it is highly probable that the Geryon myth would evoke cosmological associations in the readers of Herodotus’ text, especially when it is combined with a travel along the Oceanus and an encounter with a chthonic echidna.

5. Heracles’ liaison in Hylaea is in all probability a variant of the Great Mother, and so their encounter may be analysed as a cosmological event. At the same time, it may be the mythical model of an initiation. Heracles follows the route of the Sun to the entrance of the underworld where he kills the monster Geryon and obtains his cattle. In Hylaea he meets another obstacle, a chthonic goddess and begets with her the people of the Scythians. In the myth, we are told that the land was empty, but Herodotus soon informs that it was in fact inhabited by the Cimmerians. It is interesting that the late lexicographer Hesychius quotes Cimmeris thea, “the Cimmerian goddess”, as a name for the Mother of Gods. Furthermore, the readers of Herodotus would have known that after his return to Greece with the cattle of Geryon, Heracles was initiated into the Eleusinian mysteries,[33] before, as his last labour, he went down to Hades via Taenarum to fetch Cerberus, and he was finally divinised by the way of the pyre on Mount Oeta. Thus, the life story of Heracles follows the pattern of the initiate. Just like the struggle with Geryon corresponds to the collection of Cerberus, Heracles’ delay in Echidna’s cave is an obvious doublet or rather anticipation of his initiation into Demeter’s mysteries in Eleusis.

The Scyles story is preceded by a story about the Scythian prince Anacharsis. He is in Greek literature the prototype of the wise savage travelling in Greece and observing the alien culture. Under his name, a number of so-called apophthegms are transmitted which emphasise the absurdities of Greek civilisation. Herodotus informs that on his return from Greece, Anacharsis landed on the peninsula of Cyzicus and saw a procession for the Mother of Gods (τῇ Μητρὶ τῶν Θεῶν). He promises the goddess that he will sacrifice to her in the way of the Cyzicenes if he returns safe and sound. Thus, when he landed on the north shore, he arranged a festival of Meter in Hylaea. Unfortunately, a Scythian saw it and reported it to King Saulius, who went to the location and immediately shot Anacharsis with his bow (4.76.3-4). The story follows the same pattern as the Scyles story.

The cult of the Mother of Gods seems to be referred to in a Greek letter written on a small potsherd found in Olbia. It was originally part of a Samian vessel produced ca. 550-530 BC. The inscription consists of 12 lines of which the left and right margins are not legible anymore, and the text is therefore difficult to read (= SEG 42.710). Nevertheless, the interpretation of the lines 6-8 is quite certain:[34]

…]ληι ἐνθεῦθεν ἐς τὴν Ὑλαί[ην ...
... ] αὖτις οἱ βωμοὶ βεβλαμμένο[ι ...
... Μ]ητρὸς θεῶν καὶ Βορυσθέ(νεω) καὶ Ἡρακλ[ῆος ...

“from there to Hylaea ... once more the altars were destroyed ... of the Mother of the Gods, Borysthenes and Heracles”.

The letters have a quite archaic appearance, pointing to a date in the sixth century BC.[35] The cult is attested in another inscription from Olbia as well (= Dubois, No. 81, 5^th cent. BC): [Μητρὶ Θε]ῶν μεδεόσ[ηι] Ὑλαί[ης]. These two inscriptions attest the presence of Meter in the same spot and at the same date as Anacharsis’ ritual in Herodotus’ narrative. It is interesting that Hylaea, which is dedicated to the cult of Meter, is also the place where Heracles meets the female monster. It is tempting to identify the two deities. The mention of an altar of Heracles supports this interpretation.

The goddess introduced by Anacharsis from Cyzicus is the Phrygian Cybele (Cyzicus is close to Archaic Phrygia). She was introduced into Greece in the sixth century BC, and mysteries were performed in her name. The mysteries of Dionysus, Demeter and Cybele are of course not identical. Both the mythologies and rites differ. There are, however, important analogies and convergences, which the Classical authors emphasise: Pindar’s second dithyramb puts Cybele in connection with Dionysus (fr. 70b.6-11). In the quoted fragment of the tragedy Cretes (fr. 79 Austin), Euripides unites mysteries of Meter and Dionysus (cf. also Euripides, Bacch. 72-82; Aeschylus, fr. 57). In the Cretan mysteries, the Mother of Gods plays a central role, and Giovanni Pugliese Carratelli speaks about a more primitive version of the Dionysiac mysteries than the Orphic-Pythagorean ones represented by the South Italian gold leaves (cf. also IC 1(xxiii).3, Phaestus, 2^nd cent. BC).[36] On one of the gold leaves from Thurii (III 1), we read names like Pammater, Cybeleia and Demeter. Pseudo-Apollodorus (Bibl. 3.5.1) relates that Dionysus, after having being afflicted with madness by the jealous Hera, he wandered about in Egypt and Syria, but eventually came to Phrygia and was purified by Rheia and initiated into the rituals (τὰς τελετὰς ἐκμαθών).[37] A similar version is ascribed to the epic poet Eumelus of the eighth (?) century BC (fr. 11 Bernabé ap. Sch. Hom., Il. 6.131). The story is a close parallel to the purification and initiation of Heracles in Eleusis. Dionysus goes to Hades, too, to fetch his mortal mother Semele and make her an Olympian goddess (Hes., Theog. 940-2; Apollod., Bibl. 3.5.3; Diod.Sic. 4.25.4).[38]

The katabasis may have been an important part of the cult of the Mother. In the Eleusinian mysteries, the initiands met Persephone in a dark room, and they were thereby prepared for death (even though there were apparently no ideas about metempsychosis in Eleusis).[39] The chthonic character of Hylaea is stressed by Herodotus twice, both in the Anacharsis story (4.76) and in the catalogue of rivers (4.56) when he remarks that it lies near the Achillean Race-Course. He does not go into explaining why a locality was named after Achilleus on the north shore of the Black Sea. It was, however, well-known to any contemporaneous reader that Achilleus was worshipped as some sort of death god in Scythia.[40] The small island of Leuce east of the mouth of the Danube was considered the place to which Thetis took his mortal remains (as related in the epos Aithiopis, 8^th/7^th cent. BC). Pindar presupposes that his audience knows the island, when he says “Achilleus (rules) the bright island in the Euxine Sea” (Nem. 4.49-50 ἐν δ᾿ Εὐξείνῳ πελάγει φαεννὰν Αχιλεὺς νᾶσον). In the “Orphic” victory song, Pindar says that Achilleus was brought to “the Isle of the Blest” (Ol. 2.71-80 μακάρων νᾶσον). In other words, the Isle of the Blest and the White Island could be considered one and the same locality.[41] If Alcaeus fr. 354 V. is authentic, Achilleus was known as “the god of Scythia” already ca. 600 BC.[42] So, Herodotus’ mention of Achilleus’ Race-Course may be meant as a discrete key to the interpretation of the locality Hylaea, namely that the Mother of Gods worshipped in that locality was the patroness of chthonic mysteries not unlike those of Eleusis.[43] This reading is moreover confirmed by the juxtaposition of the stories of Anacharsis and Scyles.

6. Meter played an important role among the Pythagoreans too. According to Timaeus, Pythagoras’ house was built into a temple for Demeter (FGrHist 566 F 131 in Porph., Vita Pyth. 4). Hermippus (fr. 20 W. ap. Diog.Laert. 8.41) informs that Pythagoras built himself a subterranean chamber and hid for a time in it; he told his mother to write down what was going on on the surface, so when he returned and was able to know all that, people thought he was some kind of psychic (θεῖόν τινα). Walter Burkert is without doubt right when he proposes that “mother” stands for the goddess Meter in a more orthodox tradition and the story refers to a ritual katabasis (cf. also Hieronymus fr. 42 W. ap. Diog.Laert. 8.21).[44] Leonid Zhmud, who aims at a more rationalist and less religious Pythagoras, of course rejects this evidence.[45] On the other hand, Herodotus puts Pythagoreanism on the same footing as Orphism (2.81). Even though the doctrines and especially the myths must have differed, they were part of the same intellectual milieu, sharing concepts of the soul and the bios of the initiate.[46] As we have seen, bone tablets have been excavated in Olbia which associate Dionysus and Orphism. Another bone tablet mentions Apollo and Meter in the midst of mythical elaborations on the number seven (SEG 36.694 = Dubois, No. 93, 550-525 BC).[47] The bone tablet, which may be as old as the founding of Pythagoras’ school in Italy or even older, illustrates the character of the archaic intellectual milieu out of which Pythagoreanism eventually arose. The opposition between an Apollinian Pythagoreanism and a Dionysian Orphism is, at any rate, anachronistic. The cults of Apollo and Dionysus do not exclude one another. In the Orphic hymns, Dionysus is called Paean (52.10) and Apollo Bacchius (34.7 v.l.). Dionysus’ grave was shown to the tourists in Delphi, and it was said that the famous tripod of Apollo contained his remains (e.g. Plut., De Is. et Os. 365^a).[48]

We have already seen that what I call the eschatological string of the fourth book is anticipated in the Egyptian logos. It contains several references to the Osiris myth, which is in Herodotus’ mind identical to the Orphic Dionysus myth, and, as we shall see, the Ethiopian excursus illustrates the perfect Orphic bios. Furthermore, Herodotus claims that Greek ideas about metempsychosis are derived from an Egyptian model (2.123). He refuses to tell the names of the persons sharing them, but there can be no doubt that a contemporaneous reader would have thought of Pythagoras and Empedocles at first. Between the Egyptian and Scythian logoi, Herodotus treats the internal politics of the Persian Empire. A considerable part is taken up by the story about the Samian tyrant Polycrates (3.39-60, 120-128, 139-149). One wonders if Herodotus expects his readers to know that Pythagoras lived on Samus during the reign of Polycrates and went on his study tour in Egypt with a letter of recommendation from the tyrant himself.[49] Herodotus does not, however, stress the point, but it is not at all impossible in the general framework. At any rate, it is supported by the fact that short after the death of Polycrates – and explicitly in connexion with the Polycrates affair – the Crotonian Democedes enters the scene (3.131-137). Croton is the city where Pythagoreanism prevailed, and we know from other sources that the early Pythagoreans assembled in the house of Democedes’ father-in-law Milon.[50] In Herodotus we are told that Democedes becomes Dareios’ court physician, but escapes back to Southern Italy and marries Milon’s daughter. In accordance with his general reticence in these matters, Herodotus says nothing about Milon’s philosophical interests; he is only described as the palaistēs “wrestler” (3.137.5).[51] However, Herodotus must have been well-informed in these matters since his own biography was connected with both Samus and Southern Italy: Being expelled by Lygdamis, he lived for some time as an exile on Samus,[52] and later on he participated in the colony of Thurii, which was founded in 444 BC on the location of the former Sybaris destroyed in the war with Croton in 511 BC (cf. 5.44-45).

In the fourth book, after the myth of Heracles, Herodotus gives a third rationalist version of how the Scythian people originated, namely out of a series of migrations starting in Central Asia (4.13-15). His main source is the epic Arimaspea by Aristeas of Proconnesus. He claimed to have travelled to the tribe of the Issedones possessed by Apollo (φοιβόλαμπτος γενόμενος), i.e. probably in some sort of soul journey;[53] he lay dead, disappeared and returned after six years (ἑβδόμῳ ἔτεϊ). Herodotus adds that Aristeas showed up in Metaponton 240 years later and told to the locals that he had followed Apollo in the shape of a raven. He disappeared once more, and the Metapontines erected a statue of him next to the altar of Apollo (4.15). Since Metaponton is the city to which Pythagoras withdraws after a crisis in Croton, this story must belong to the Pythagorean tradition.

Herodotus continues his account with an outline of the geography of the Scythian territory, from the Black Sea to the Issedones (4.16-31). He is probably following the scheme laid out by Aristeas’ epic.[54] Herodotus stresses at the outset (with reference to Aristeas) and at the end of this outline that nobody can say anything about what is lying further north. Then, he starts to argue against the idea of the so-called Hyperboreans (4.32-36.1). He speaks about the mythical Hyperborean delegations to Delus and ends with the words: “I will not tell the story told about Abaris, and say how he carried his arrow all around the world without eating anything” (4.36).[55] Later sources relate how Abaris flew to Greece on an arrow given to him by Apollo (Heraclides Ponticus, fr. 51c W.), and how he meets Pythagoras in Southern Italy and recognises him as the Hyperborean Apollo (Iambl., VP, 19.90-91; Porph., VP 28). I find it quite obvious that Herodotus alludes to the same story,[56] but deliberately chooses not to tell it explicitly. The loud praeteritio suffices to bring the point to the mind of his readers. After having laid out the Scythian origin and geography with reference to two persons who were most likely central in Pythagorean mythology because they demonstrated Apollo’s acknowledge of the master’s authority, Herodotus continues with an excursus in which he criticises the traditional representation of the map of the world and especially the concept of the Oceanus, the World-Stream (4.36.2-45, cf. also 3.115). It is ironical, but hardly a coincidence, that he undermines the Geryon myth when he expresses his doubts of the possibility of sailing north of Europe. The two tales are tied together in the negation.

The first time Pythagoras’ name is mentioned explicitly is in chapter 4.95. In an excursus on Dareios’ journey through Thrace, Herodotus speaks about the Getans and their belief in an immortal soul; after death one comes to the god Zalmoxis, and therefore the Getans show an extreme carelessness with their lives.[57] Herodotus ascribes to the local Greeks a down-to-earth explanation of the Getan religion: Zalmoxis was earlier the slave of Pythagoras on Samus, but he was freed and returned to Thrace. He taught his compatriots that they should not die, but come to another place and live there happy forever after. He convinced them about the truth of this doctrine by building a subterranean chamber to himself and hiding in it for three years. It is pretty much the same story as the one told about Pythagoras. As Walter Burkert points out, Hermippus has not simply duplicated Herodotus’ version, for the detail about the “mother” does not occur there.[58] Even though Herodotus is sceptic about this version (he prefers a much higher date for Zalmoxis), by telling it, he gives a useful hint to the interpretation of the Scythian logos. The suppressed allusions are solved.

The stories of Scyles and Zalmoxis are obviously connected in the narrative of Herodotus. The ritual death practised by Zalmoxis corresponds to the physical death suffered by Scyles. The red thread is the border between the civilised world and the steppes and between new and old religion. The bridge of Darius over the Hellespont leads to the Dionysus temple in Byzantion (4.88), and Thrace is in a sense a Dionysiac territory. The bridge itself is an obvious symbol of an initiation (though it would probably be an overinterpretation to suggest that the Samian nationality of its architect is meant as an indication of its Pythagorean character). Transgressing the Danube by another bridge, Darius comes into a world that is again completely different; it is a kind of katabasis in which the enemy is just as intangible as the shadows of Hades, and the army has a narrow escape. Dareios’ expedition follows an axis, which is repeated several times in the fourth book: Anacharsis travels from Cyzicus to Hylaea, and Aristeas from Cyzicus to beyond the Scythian territory. Immediately after the stories of Anacharsis and Scyles, Herodotus speaks about two gigantic cauldrons put up by the Scythian Ariantas and the Spartan Pausanias in Exampaeus and at the Bosporus respectively.

I do not suggest that Herodotus followed a single specific doctrine and his text should be regarded as some kind of sacred text of a religious society. He alludes indiscriminately to the polymorph mass of eschatological “schools” prevailing in the fifth century BC in order to stress a more general point in his narrative. Herodotus states at the beginning of the Egyptian logos that he is generally reluctant towards speaking about “divine matters” (τὰ θεῖα τῶν ἀπηγημάτων) because “all people have the same knowledge about them” (2.3.3, similarly 2.65.2). However, this does not mean that he is an atheist. He often refers to divine causes, e.g. when the Demeter sanctuary in Plataeae is free from corpses of Persian soldiers because the goddess will not have them on her soil after they have burnt her temple in Eleusis (9.65.2). He says he was initiated into the Samothracian mysteries (2.51.8), and he was probably initiated into the Orphic-Dionysiac mysteries as well since he repeatedly refers to some vow of silence. He was certainly sympathetic towards the Pythagorean doctrine, calling Pythagoras “not the worst sage among the Greeks” (4.94.2 Ἑλλήνων οὐ τῷ ἀσθενεστάτῳ σοφιστῇ). It would, on the other hand, be wrong to see the Histories as a Holy Scripture of an Orphic-Pythagorean sect. Herodotus does quote the story about Zalmoxis’ hide in the subterranean chamber, which was certainly meant as a criticism not only of the local Getan religion, but also of Pythagoras’ ritual katabasis, even if he rejects this version.[59] He seems to accept the fantastic story of Aristeas’ second coming in Metaponton, but he refuses to relate the Abaris story. Herodotus’ rationalism means that he cannot rely on hearsay that has not been substantiated by other evidence; but he does not reject the existence of divine causes or a higher justice.

7. In the Geryon myth, Heracles is the prototype of the nomadic herdsman. Sitting in his chariot, he drives the cattle on the outskirts of the world, just like the nomadic Scythians are driving their cattle on the northern steppes with their horses and carriages. In the case of Heracles, however, the status as a lawless cattle thief is only a phase, a rite of liminality, which will eventually lead to civilisation (by the way of his initiation into the mysteries) and apotheosis. His Scythian offspring sticks in this phase,[60] and when Scyles is going through the initiation, which is supposed to introduce him into civilisation, he is consequently killed by his compatriots. The way Herodotus presents the Scythian religion, it is characterised by the absence of the civilising agricultural gods Demeter and Dionysus, whereas dreadful Ares is the most important god (4.59-62). The opposition to the agricultural religion peaks in the stories about Anacharsis and Scyles, who practise the rituals of Meter and Dionysus respectively and are killed for this very reason. On the other hand, the only cults that Herodotus mentions in the case of the Greek colonists in Olbia are the cults of Demeter (4.53.6) and Dionysus (4.79). This choice is not arbitrary: The two cults teach in their mysteries the meaning of civilisation, why it makes sense to cultivate earth and not to wander about like wild beasts that eat the fruits of the trees or each other. According to Euripides (Bacch. 274-285), Demeter and Dionysus were the two first gods of man, the goddess of the dry food and the god of the anaesthetic liquor respectively. It was probably part of the Athenian propaganda of the fifth century BC that agriculture arose in Attica as a result of Demeter’s mysteries in Eleusis (cf. Xen., Hell. 6.3.6). In the eyes of the Athenians, the mysteries meant the “Beendigung des Urkannibalismus”.[61] Thus, by hindering the introduction of the cults of Meter and Dionysus, the Scythians resist to give up their primitive economy based on meat and milk.

In the third book, Herodotus speaks about the magic table of the Sun, which provides the people of the Ethiopians with meat without the unpleasant sacrifice of blood (3.18). Jean-Pierre Vernant compares it to the story about the cattle of the Sun in the Odyssey (12.260-402):[62] On the return from Hades and the island of Circe, Odysseus lands on the island of the Sun. In spite of several warnings, his men decide to sacrifice the cattle and eat the meat. It is the ultimate sacrilege. Even after it has been roasted, the meat is still raw, the hides are wandering about and the slaughtered animals are still mooing. It is the perfect example of ōmophagia.[63] It is likely that Herodotus presupposes that his readers are familiar with this story of the Odyssey. The army that Cambyses sends against the Ethiopians ends up starving and resorts to cannibalism, a sacrilege comparable to that of Odysseus’ men (3.25.6). In other words, the Ethiopian excursus, which is a natural prolongation of the Egyptian logos, offers an example of the Orphic bios, according to which people eat without having to slay other creatures.[64]

Whereas the mythical Hyperboreans occupied an idealistic place comparable to that of the Ethiopians,[65] the Scythians were not at all sacred: They sacrifice by strangulation (4.60-61), i.e. they eat the meat with the blood.[66] The Ethiopians lived long, and when they died, their corpses did not putrefy (3.24). On the other hand, murder was the daily order among the Scythians and the neighbouring tribes. In the northern Scythian territory, we hear about the Neuri, who were werewolves (4.105.2), and the Androphagi, who were cannibals (4.106). The Issedones east of the Scythians slaughter and cook their fathers when they die (4.26). Similar rites are ascribed to the Indian Callatians (3.38.4) and Padaeans (3.99) who are described as nomads. Thus, the nomadic cuisine was quite the opposite of the Orphic-Pythagorean diet.[67] Already in the first book, immediately before the excursus on Egypt, we hear about the Central Asiatic Massagetes, who were ascribed to the Scythians by some (but not by Herodotus): They considered it the most blessed lot (ὀλβιώτατα) to be cooked when one died, whereas those who died by illness were buried, which was considered a misfortune (1.216). The division of the deceased into blessed and unfortunate ones sounds like a perversion of the teachings of the Orphics. The parallelism may be even more outspoken if one conjectures that the Orphic initiate was the victim of a ritual cannibalistic act after the model of Dionysus himself.

The Scythians are notorious milk drinkers. Since Herodotus dedicates the first chapters of the Scythian logos to the fabrication of mare milk, this peculiar diet must be, in his eyes, an important sign of their economy (the same diet is attributed to the Scythians in Hes., fr. 150.15, and Hipp., Aer. 18).[68] The Massagetes are called galaktopotai, “milk-drinkers” (1.216.3). The nomadic Libyans live on meat and drink milk (4.186.1). The Cyclops is since the Odyssey the emblem of the nomad: He does not cultivate the earth, but eats meat, milk and cheese and is a dreadful cannibal. Drinking milk is of course not the same as being a brutal murderer. The mare-milking and milk-consuming Abii of the Iliad are the most just of men (Hom., Il. 13.5.6). Herodotus informs that the Ethiopians eat boiled meat and drink milk (3.24.2), and they despise the consumption of grain (3.22.4). It just means that you do not belong to the agricultural urbanised civilisation. To quote Aristotle, a person living outside of a polis is either worse or better than man (Pol. 1253^a). The Ethiopians are certainly better (since their consumption of meat does not imply the death of another being) and the Cyclops certainly worse.

In Euripides’ satyr play Cyclops, the one-eyed giants are called “nomads” (v. 120);[69] they do not sow “Demeter’s ear of corn” or drink “Bromios’ drink, the juice of the grape” (vv. 121, 123); the Cyclops’ shelter is empty of Bacchants (Cyc. 63-75), but he is finally “defeated by Bacchos” (Cyc. 446, 454, 521, 575), and the choir ends in a laudation of Dionysus (Cyc. 709). We have no indications that Herodotus knew this satyr play, and it is probably too late.[70] Yet, they share the same concept of civilisation. The space of the Cyclops is called an erēmia (Cyc. 22, 116, 447, 622). The phrase Skythōn erēmia, which is the name of the Scythian steppes in Pseudo-Hippocrates (Aer. 18), becomes proverbial as a designation of the conditions of primitive man (since Ar., Ach. 704; it is popular in Imperial and Byzantine authors). In Herodotus, the inner space of the Scythians is not described as deserted, but the adjective erēmos usually characterises the frontier regions of Scythia (4.17.2, 4.18.2, 4.18.3, 4.20.2, 4.22.1, 4.53.4, 4.123.2, 4.124.1, 4.125.5, 4.127.2).[71] Thus, Herodotus transposes the traditional scheme of a polis and an uninhabited periphery centre to the Black Sea area. It has itself a centre inhabited and cultivated by Greeks or semi-Greeks and a desolate periphery into which the Scythians can choose to recede, and where the graves of their ancestors are located (4.53.4, 4.127.2-3).[72] In the Dionysiac cult, as we have seen, unrestrained rituals were performed on mountain tops and in other desolate places, where victims were torn and eaten raw. When Euripides speaks about “the raw-eating mountain-walking Cyclops” (Tro. 436), the Cyclops becomes some kind of uninitiated, self-appointed Bacchant, who cannot escape the lunacy. Similarly, the Skythōn erēmia is represented as a liminal space inhabited by uncivilised non-initiates.

8. According to Herodotus, the Scythians criticise the Dionysiac cult of the Greeks because they think it is wrong to invent a god that drives people mad. This sobriety of Scythian religion is in sharp conflict with the ecstatic shamanism which is ascribed to the Scythians in modern scholarly literature and considered an important source of inspiration for Greek Pythagoreanism and Orphism. This line of thought is represented by Karl Meuli, Eric R. Dodds, Walter Burkert and Martin L. West.[73] In spite of these awe-inspiring names, some opposition has been uttered, especially by Jan N. Bremmer and Leonid Zhmud.[74] The hypothesis of a Scythian shamanism rests on two pieces of information found in Herodotus:

A) The Scythians had a certain type of soothsayers called Enarees, who were characterised by a feminine behaviour (1.105.4 θήλειαν νοῦσον; 4.67.2 οἱ ἀνδρόγυνοι).

B) Scythian funerals involved a purification ceremony, during which hashish seeds were burnt in tents and caused great satisfaction in the participants (4.73-75).

On the basis of Central Asiatic and American parallels, Karl Meuli concluded that the Scythians had cross-dressing shamans, who used hallucinating drugs to be able to leave their bodies and lead the souls of the dead safely to the underworld. However, Herodotus does not describe the Enarees as shamans; they are soothsayers, who read the future in birch bark, but we are told of no soul journeys at all (similarly in Hipp., Aer. 18). It is true that shamans in some cultures dress and live like the opposite sex, but it does not necessarily mean that any transgender magician is also a shaman. Moreover, the association of the Enarees with the hashish tents is without any basis in the text of Herodotus. He says they were used for purification instead of baths, and it is evident that he intends a contrast between Greek water and Scythian fire as a means of purification. Hashish tents have been excavated in a Kurgan in Pazyryk in Central Asia, but there is nothing that links them to shamanism.[75] On the other hand, there is nothing that excludes a shamanistic interpretation either. Even if the hallucinating effect of hemp seeds is rather limited, it may have served some purpose that had to do with the soul of the deceased being led safely to the hereafter. The phenomena of soul journey and bilocation are in Greek literature frequently associated with the distant north.[76] As we have seen, Aristeas travels to a people living east of the Scythians, and Abaris comes from a country beyond the north wind. Similarly, according to Bacchylides (3.57-60), Croesus was rescued from the pyre and moved to the Hyperboreans. Stesichorus had got the impetus for his Palinody, which put Helen in Egypt and her eidōlon in Troy, from Leonymus of Croton (!), who had visited the island of Leuce and talked with Helen’s ghost (Conon FGrHist 26 F 1, XVIII; Paus. 3.19.11-13). This preference for the north may, however, reflect a fundamental geographical scheme in Greek thought, which is independent of the ethnographical realities.

It has been argued that shamanism originated in Central Asia under the influence of Buddhism.[77] In that case it is rather difficult to imagine that the Greeks were influenced by Scythian shamanism in the seventh or eighth centuries BC already. Ken Dowden argues that the Greek practice of soul journey was borrowed directly from some previous stage of the ecstatic practices which eventually led to Buddhism.[78] The evidence for contacts between India and Greece in this early period is, however, virtually non-existent.[79] On the other hand, the Scythians may in fact have shared the same beliefs about the immortality of the soul and its capability of leaving the body. Scythians and Indians belonged to the same branch of the Indo-European family, and they were in the first centuries of the first millennium BC not so different linguistically and culturally as to exclude an exchange of ideas. Thus, before we make Aristeas go all the way to India to be apprenticed to a former incarnation of Buddha, we should perhaps trace the inspiration to the Scythians, who ca. 700 BC crossed the Caucasus and advanced along the northern coast of Asia Minor (the so-called “Cimmerians”). Thus, early ecstatic practices may have been borrowed from India to the neighbouring Sakas in Bactria and then introduced to the Greeks by the Pontic Scythians; after all, the steppe nomads were extremely mobile. Another possibility is that the Scythians inherited a more primitive stage of ecstatic practices which was borrowed to the Greeks and later developed into shamanism stricto sensu under the influence of Buddhism. It is, however, mere conjecture. It is true that Herodotus does not give any reason at all for assuming that the Scythians practised any proto-shamanistic ecstatic rituals, but as we have seen, he may have had his own motives for suppressing such beliefs and offering instead a non-spiritualistic, behaviouristic description of the Scythian cult.

At any rate, ideas about an afterlife are attested by the Scythian burial customs. According to Herodotus, when a Scythian king died, he was buried in a large tumulus together with one of his wives, fifty servants and fifty horses (4.72). The described rituals agree tremendously well with the archaeological record; the so-called Kurgan graves are scattered all over the area dominated by the Scythians.[80] We have seen that the Getans, the neighbours of the Scythians, had ideas about an immortal soul and aspired to death, and similar beliefs and practices are ascribed to the Celts (Diod.Sic. 5.28.6; Caes., BGall. 6.14.5). The Scythians may very well have thought of the royal funerals in the same way. Herodotus informs that the Scythians had the deceased transported around in forty days before he was buried (4.73.1). This custom becomes a macabre contrast to the Orphic-Pythagorean doctrine, which must have been in the minds of the contemporary reader after he has read (or heard) the Egyptian logos and the first part of the Scythian logos. Instead of a soul journey, we have a bizarre body journey. The rich grave gifts and the tour of the dead body emphasise the material continuity, but nothing is said about the soul of the dead.

9. The so-called eschatological string rests primarily on four episodes in the fourth book of Herodotus’ Histories:

Heracles’ journey to Erytheia and his encounter with the chthonic monster in Hylaea (4.8-10).
Aristeas’ last journey to Metaponton and the transient mention of Abaris (4.11-15, 4.36.1).
Scyles’ initiation into the Dionysiac mysteries and his subsequent execution (4.78-80).
Zalmoxis’ vulgar Pythagorean religion (4.93-96).

My hypothesis is that these are not isolated episodes, but bricks in a more fundamental structure of Herodotus’ narrative. Herodotus prepares his readers for this analysis in the earlier books of his Histories. In the second book he repeatedly refers to the Dionysus/Osiris myth (though implicitly, bound as he is by some Orphic pledge of secrecy); he speaks about an Orphic-Pythagorean taboo against burying the dead in wool cloths (2.81) and the concept of metempsychosis being derived from Egypt (2.123). In the third book the Ethiopian table of the Sun suggests the Orphic-Pythagorean bios (3.17-25), and the Polycrates and Democedes episodes bring Pythagoras’ birthplace Samus and his later home Croton into the scene (3.39-60, 120-149). The prominence of the Croesus story in the first book with its emphasis on true happiness and the king’s enlightenment on the pyre (1.29-33, 86-87) must have contributed to the expectations as well. The single episodes and references do not suffice per se, but the accumulation of them makes it highly probable that they served a purpose in the narrative.

The episodes i., ii., and iv. involve some sort of initiation into the mysteries of Meter or Dionysus. The core of the initiation is a rite of liminality that takes place either in Hades (a subterranean chamber) or in the wilderness. In the Orphic-Dionysiac initiation, the initiand probably went through some sort of ritual death by virtue of which he was identified with the murdered god himself; he was torn to pieces and cooked (symbolically). After that, the initiate observed a different bios from others and ate differently, and after death he would expect a special treatment, some kind of apotheosis or redemption from the “wheel of reincarnation”. The catechumens Anacharsis and Scyles, on the other hand, never succeeded in their initiations, but traded the ritual death of the blessed for a less coveted physical one.

The bios of the Scythian nomad is comparable to that of the liminal phase, but it does not lead to a sacred bios. The eschatological allusions, which would be perfectly comprehensible to “those who know”, underline the Scythians’ fundamental lack of agricultural civilisation. Thus, when crossing the Danube into the land of the Scythians, Darius enters a nightmare landscape of inverted values. His campaign is unsuccessful, and he returns uninitiated, immediately before he begins his great, but tragic war with Greece, the heart of civilisation. In other words, the many subtle eschatological references contribute in making Book 4 the pivotal scene of Herodotus’ Histories, which are basically about the tragic Clash of Civilisations between the Orient and Occident.

NOTES

[1] The present article is an enlarged version of a paper published in Danish (= Hinge 2004b).

[2] 4.76.1 ξεινικοῖσι δὲ νομαίοισι καὶ οὗτοι φεύγουσι αἰνῶς χρᾶσθαι, μήτε γέων ἄλλεων, Ἑλληνικοῖσι δὲ καὶ μάλιστα.

[3] Dubois 1996, 152, suggests that the very name of the city is due to the influence of the Orphic cult (“the blessed city”, cf. SEG 36.694 = Dubois, No. 93). Vinogradov 1997 emphasises the political significance of the Orphic-Dionysiac cult.

[4] Rusjaeva 1989, 80-82 = Dubois 1996, No. 92 Δημώνασσα Ληναίο εὐαί καὶ Λήναιος Δημόκλο εἰαί. The exclamation εὐαί (like εὐάν and εὐοῖ) is associated with Dionysiac cult.

[5] Dettori 1996.

[6] It is normally assumed that the deceased died of excessive drinking or simply liked to drink (cf. Struve 1965, 115). However, the juncture [Λ]ηναίου [π]νείοντα resembles Nonnus, Dion. 19.133 ληνὸν ἔτι πνείοντα, and it may have been part of an Orphic hymnic tradition. Sim., Anth.Pal. 7.25 = 67 Page, which shows several affinities with our epigram, may reflect the same tradition.

[7] εὕδων οὖν Ἑκαταῖε, μεσόχρονος, ἴσθ᾿ ὅτι θᾶσσον κύκλον ἀνιηρῶν ἐχέφυγες καμάτων: cf. Pugliese Carratelli II B 1.5 κύκλον δ᾿ ἐξέπταν βαρυπενθέος καρπαλίμοισι, Orph., fr. 229 κύκλου τ᾿ ἂν λήξαι καὶ ἀναπνεύσαι κακότητος, 224b.1-2 οὕνεκ᾿ ἀμειβομένη ψυχὴ κατὰ κύκλα χρόνοιο ἀνθρώπων ζώιοισι μετέρχεται ἄλλοθεν ἄλλοις (cf. also Antiphilus, Anth.Pal. 6.95.6 Πάρμις, ἀνιηρῶν παυσάμενος καμάτων).

[8] Cf., e.g., Graf 1993; Burkert 2003, 79-106.

[9] The most recent edition is Pugliese Carratelli 2001. This type of instructions may be due to the model of the Egyptian Book of the Dead, cf. Merkelbach 1999.

[10] Cf. Graf 1993.

[11] Cf. Henrichs 1994, 47-51.

[12] Graf 1985, 285-291.

[13] It is exactly what the festivals are to the Athenians according to Pericles (in Thucydides 2.38): τῶν πόνων πλείστας ἀναπαύλας. The Athenian festivals celebrated in the honour of Dionysus had nothing to do with eschatological mysteries; apparently, this need was fulfilled by the Eleusinian mysteries instead.

[14] Burkert 1972a, 50-51.

[15] For the importance of cosmology in the mystery cult, see Obbink 1997.

[16] Cf. also Diod.Sic. 3.65.8; Eus., Praep.ev. 2.2.5; Hymn.Orph. 44.7, 45 (title), 52.8, 53.4, 54.3. Cf. Jeanmaire 1951, 172, 218-219; Merkelbach 1988, 86-87.

[17] LSAM 48.18-20 καὶ ἐάν τις γυνὴ βούληται τελεῖν τῶι Διονύσωι | τῶι Βακχίωι ἐν τῆι πόλει ἢ ἐν τῆι χώραι ἢ ἐν ταῖς νήσοις, [ἀπο]|διδότω τῆι ἱερείαι στατῆρα κατ’ ἑκάστην τριετηρίδα.

[18] As suggested by the testimony of Firmicus Maternus; cf. also Sch. Clem.Al., Protr., p. 318 Stählin δύσαγνον κρεανομίαν· ὠμὰ γὰρ ἤσθιον κρέα οἱ μυούμενοι Διονύσῳ, δεῖγμα τοῦτο τελούμενοι τοῦ σπαραγμοῦ, ὃν ὑπέστη Διόνυσος ὑπὸ τῶν Μαινάδων. According to Pindar, fr. 133, those who are reborn have atoned an old suffering (οἷσι Φερσεφόνα ποινὰν παλαιοῦ πένθεος δέξεται).

[19] Lloyd 1976, vol. 2, 279; Burkert 2002.

[20] Lloyd-Jones 1985, 257.

[21] Burkert 1961.

[22] For the twelve labours, cf. Brommer 1953. West 1997, 470-472, proposes an Egyptian model.

[23] Hinge 2004a. Other potential sources are Pisander and Herodotus’ own uncle, Panyassis.

[24] Pherecydes of Athens seems to have identified Erythia with Gadeira like Herodotus (fr. 18b Fowler ap. Strb. 3.5.4), whereas Hectaeus locates the scene in Epirus (fr. 26 Fowler ap. Arr., Anab. 2.16.4). Pherecydes also has the story about the golden cup (fr. 18 Fowler).

[25] Fontenrose 1959, 94-120.

[26] Latin vitulus: Hellanicus, fr. 111 Fowler (ap. Dion.Hal., Ant.Rom. 1.35.2); the same etymology, but without the mythical reason in Varro, Rust. 2.1.9; Gell., NA 9.1.2.

[27] Albinus 2000, 79-81. Cf. Sch. Hom., Od. 11.385. Diod.Sic., Bibl. 1.96.6-9, sees Orphic-Egyptian influence in the second Nekyia (Book 24).

[28] West 1983, 190-194; Brisson 1985; 1995. Brisson stresses that the Derveni papyrus does not represent an earlier phase of the Orphic “Rhapsodies”. At any rate, Pindar has a Χρόνος ὁ πάντων πατήρ in the highly Orphic second Olympian hymn (vv. 16-17).

[29] According to some sources, Heracles is called Recaranus or Garanus in this myth; it is probably a corruption of *Tricaranus “three-horned”, cf. Puccioni 1970. The three-headedness of the opponent seems to have been replaced by a three-hornedness of the hero. Cf. also Lincoln 1981, 112 + n.81.

[30] Burkert 1979, 78-98; Watkins 1995, 464-468. On a possible Indo-European origin of Orpheus, cf. Estell 1999.

[31] Watkins 1995, 448-459 (he observes that the verb ἱμάσσω occurring repeatedly in the Greek versions (Il. 2.457; Hes., Theog. 857; Hymn.Hom.Apoll. 340) reflects ishimanta in the Hittite version).

[32] West 1997, 465. There seem to have been myths about the death and resurrection of Melqart, cf. Mettinger 2001, 83-111.

[33] Pindar (?) fr. 346 S.-M.; Eur., HF. 611-613; Apollod., Bibl. 2.5.12; allusions in Ar., Ran. They probably all go back to a lost epic, cf. Lloyd-Jones 1967; Graf 1974, 139-150. According to Lada-Richards 1999, Heracles in Aristophanes’ Ranae represents an “alterity” in contrast to the initiate Dionysus.

[34] Rusjaeva & Vinogradov 1991.

[35] Dubois 1996, 56-7, has questioned the date of the editors because of the occasional spelling ου for the secondary (closed) ō, which is unusual in the Olbian inscriptions before 400 BC. However, the style of the letters is clearly archaic. Furthermore, even if ου is not attested in contemporaneous Olbian inscriptions, it occurs occasionally in other areas of the Greek world in the archaic age already.

[36] Pugliese Carratelli 2001, 86-93. According to West 1983, 140-175, the syncretism of Dionysiac and Cretan cult is typical for the fifth cent. BC and the so-called Eudemian theogony.

[37] Steph.Byz. s.v. Μάσταυρα claims that Dionysus was raised by Rhea. As the mystes of Cybele/Rhea Dionysus becomes a gallos like the Attis. Dionysus was probably not castrated literally in any tradition. However, his extreme effeminacy in Classical tradition made him a sort of eunuch. Furthermore, Herodotus alludes to the Egyptian myth of the disappearance of the penis of Osiris/Dionysus (2.48.3).

[38] She seems to be another Thracian-Phrygian doublet of Demeter / Kore (cf. Phrygian ζεμελως “earth gods” < PIE *d^hĝ^hem‑ = χθών).

[39] Burkert 1972a, 323-326; Graf 1974, 79-94.

[40] Hommel 1980, 63-64; Hedreen 1991; Rusjaeva 1992, 70-83.

[41] Hommel 1980, 18. Cf. also Pliny, NH 4.93 eadem Leuce et Macaron appellata and Sch. Pind., Ol. 2.109-149.

[42] Ἀχίλλευς ὀ τὰς Σκυθίκας μέδεις. It is interesting that Alcaeus uses a word which is attested in dedications from Leuce: SEG 30.869 Ἀχιλλῆι Λευκῇ μεδέοντι (5^th cent. BC); IPE I².326.2 Ἀχιλλεῖ [Λευκ]ῆς μεδέοντι (4^th cent. BC). Dubois 1996, 99-100, conjectures that the common source was the Aithiopis. However, the participle μεδέων + Gen. is common in epicleses to other gods in inscriptions found in the northern Black Sea area: CIRB 31.5; 35.2; 75.12; 971.2; 1111.4 (Aphrodite); Dubois, No. 81 (Meter); No. 58 (Apollo); CIRB 22 (Hecate); 1315.3 (Artemis). It is less frequent in inscriptions from other areas: IG I³ 1492; 37; 1493; 1494; 1495; 1491; 1454; SEG 22.274 (Athena); Tituli Calymnii 108; 109; 110 (Apollo). It was possibly a formula of the archaic hymn language that remained popular in the periphery.

[43] In the Derveni papyrus, the goddesses Rheia, Demeter, Gaia and Hera are equated (col. xxiii).

[44] Burkert 1972b, 155-159.

[45] Zhmud 1997, 115.

[46] Burkert 1972b, 132; 2003, 105-106; Bremmer 2002, 11-24.

[47] Lévêque 2000.

[48] Burkert 1972a, 140-142.

[49] Cf. Aristox., fr. 16 W.; Apollod. FGrHist 244 F 339.

[50] Aristox., fr. 18 W.; Iambl., VP 248-252.

[51] It must be emphasised that wrestling was in antiquity an aristocratic sport and by no means incompatible with a philosophical mind; allegedly, Plato was a wrestler as well (Diog.Laert. 3.4).

[52] Suda s.v. Ἡρόδοτος.

[53] Dowden 1980. Bolton 1962 and Alemany i Vilamajó 1999, 45-55, insist on a physical journey.

[54] It is supported by Herodotus’ preference for the phrase κατύπερθε πρὸς βορέην (4.7.3; 4.20.2; 4.22.1; 4.25.1), which recurs in a fragment of the Arimaspea (fr. 5 Bernabé). On the other hand, Ivantchik 1993 asserts that Aristeas has borrowed it from Ionic prose and dates him accordingly to ca. 500 BC.

[55] τὸν γὰρ περὶ Ἀβάριος λόγον τοῦ λεγομένου εἶναι οὐ λέγω (λέγων, ὡς τὸν ὀιστὸν περιέφερε κατὰ πᾶσαν γῆν οὐδὲν σιτεόμενος). To avoid the repetition of the verb λέγειν, Rosén 1987 deletes the parenthesis, while Corcella & Medaglia 1993 defend the transmitted text. Such pleonasms are not unusual for Herodotus’ Greek, e.g. 1.94.2 ἅμα δὲ ταύτας τε ἐξευρεθῆναι παρὰ σφίσι λέγουσι καὶ Τυρσηνίην ἀποικίσαι, ὧδε περὶ αὐτῶν λέγοντες.

[56] Cf. Meuli 1935, 159-160; Dodds 1951, 161 n. 33; Burkert 1972b, 150 (criticism in Bolton 1962, 158; Bremmer 2002, 33).

[57] Linforth 1918; Eliade 1970, 39-42.

[58] Burkert 1972b, 159.

[59] Burkert 1972b, 161.

[60] The Scythian myth of origin (4.5-7) is probably associated with a rite of passage not unlike the Doric rituals concerning the inclusion to the three phylae; the young men are going through a phase of liminality including a ritual death, cf. Hinge 2003a. In Herodotus’ discourse the signs of liminality are often extended to Scythia as such.

[61] Graf 1974.

[62] Vernant 1979.

[63] Burkert 1990, 9-10.

[64] Orphic vegetarianism is attested in Eur., Hipp. 952-4; Ar., Ran. 1032; Plat., Leg. 782^c.

[65] Cf. Hell. fr. 187b Fowler αὐτοὺς δικαιοσύνην μὴ κρεοφαγοῦντας, ἀλλ᾽ ἀκροδρύοις χρωμένους; the diet of Abaris is even more ascetic in Hdt. 4.36.1 (οὐ σιτεόμενος).

[66] Hartog 1979.

[67] For the archaeological background of the rituals described by Herodotus, see Murphy & Mallory 2000.

[68] Shaw 1982-83.

[69] It has been suggested to read μονάδες instead of νομάδες (cf. Schmidt 1975, 291), but the transmitted form is more special than the conjecture and therefore more probable.

[70] Seaford 1982; 1984, 48-51.

[71] According to Caesar (BGall. 6.23), the Germanic tribes showed their power by having as much empty borderland around their territories as possible. It may have been an ideal common to non-urbanised tribes in Central and Eastern Europe, cf. Hinge 2003b, 26-30.

[72] Thus, from the point of view of the Scythians themselves, periphery becomes centre, cf. Hartog 1991, 153-157; Hinge 2003b, 28-30.

[73] Meuli 1935; Dodds 1951, 134-178; Burkert 1972b, 120-165; West 1983, 143-150; Margreth 1993.

[74] Bremmer 1983, 24-53; 2002, 27-40; Zhmud 1997, 107-116. Cf. also Dowden 1980.

[75] Rudenko 1970, 284-285; Wolf & Andraschko 1991.

[76] Dodds 1951, 161 n. 32.

[77] Eliade 1951; Hermanns 1970, vol. 2, 343-346, argues that shamanism arose in an area between Persia, Tibet and India in the first centuries AD under the influence of Zoroastrism and Buddhism.

[78] Dowden 1979.

[79] Karttunen 1989, 108-119; Halbfass 1991-92.

[80] Sulimirski 1985, 169-171; Thordarson 1988.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Albinus, L. 2000. The House of Hades. Aarhus.

Alemany i Vilamajó, A. 1999. Els “Cants arimaspeus” d’Arísteas de Proconnès, Faventia 21, 45-55.

Bolton, J.D.P. 1962. Aristeas of Proconnesus. Oxford.

Bremmer, J.N. 1983. The Early Greek Concept of the Soul. Princeton, NJ.

Bremmer, J.N. 2002. The Rise and Fall of the Afterlife. London, New York.

Brisson, L. 1985. La figure de Chronos dans la théogonie orphique, in: D. Tiffeneau (ed.), Mythes et représentations du temps. Paris, 37-55.

Brisson, L. 1995. Chronos in Column XII of the Derveni Papyrus, in: A. Laks & G.W. Most (eds.), Studies on the Derveni Papyrus. Oxford, 149-165.

Brommer, F. 1953. Herakles. Die zwölf Taten des Helden in antiker Kunst und Literatur. Münster, Köln.

Burkert, W. 1961. Elysion, Glotta 39, 208-213.

Burkert, W. 1972a. Homo necans. Berlin, New York.

Burkert, W. 1972b. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, MA.

Burkert, W. 1979. Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley, Los Angeles.

Burkert, W. 1990. Herodot als Historiker fremder Religionen, in: G. Nenci (ed.), Hérodote et les peuples non grecs. Vandœuvres-Genève, 1-32.

Burkert, W. 2002. Mysterien der Ägypter in griechischer Sicht, in: J. Assmann & M. Bommas (eds.), Ägyptische Mysterien? München, 9-26.

Burkert, W. 2003. Die Griechen und der Orient. Von Homer bis zu den Magiern. München.

Corcella, A., & S.M. Medaglia 1993. Erodoto. Le storie. Libro IV. La Scizia e la Libia. Milano.

Detienne, M. & J.-P. Vernant (eds.) 1979. La cuisine du sacrifice en pays grecs. Paris.

Dettori, E. 1996. Testi Orfici dalla Magna Grecia al Mar Nero, PP 51, 292-310.

Dodds, E.R. 1951. The Greeks and Irrational. Berkeley and Los Angeles.

Dowden, K. 1979. Apollon et l’esprit dans la machine, Rev.Ét.Grec. 92, 293-318.

Dowden, K. 1980. Deux notes sur les Scythes et les Arimaspes, Rev.Ét.Grec. 92, 486-492.

Dubois, L. 1996. Inscriptions grecques dialectales d’Olbia du Pont. Genève.

Eliade, M. 1951. Le chamanisme et les techniques archaiques de l’extase. Paris.

Eliade, M. 1970. De Zalmoxis à Gengis-Khan. Paris.

Estell, M. 1999. Orpheus and Rbhu revisited, JIES 27, 327-333.

Fontenrose, J. 1959. Python. A Study of Delphic Myth and Its Origin. Berkeley, Los Angeles.

Graf, F. 1974. Eleusis und die orphische Dichtung Athens. Berlin, New York.

Graf, F. 1985. Nordionische Kulte. Rome.

Graf, F. 1993. Dionysian and Orphic Eschatology, in: T.H. Carpenter & C.A. Faraone (eds.), Masks of Dionysus. Ithaca, London, 239-258.

Halbfass, W. 1991-92. Early Indian References to the Greeks, in: H. Bechert (ed.), The Dating of the Historical Buddha. Göttingen, vol. 1, 197-208.

Hartog, F. 1979. Le bœuf “autocuiseur” et les boissons d’Arès, in: Detienne & Vernant 1979, 251-269.

Hartog, F. 1991. Le miroir d’Herodote. Paris, 2^nd edition.

Hedreen, G. 1991. The Cult of Achilles in the Euxine, Hesperia 60, 313-330.

Henrichs, A. 1994. Der rasende Gott, Antike und Abendland 40, 31-58.

Hermanns, M. 1970. Schamanen – Pseudoschamanen. Wiesbaden.

Hinge, G. 2003a. Scythian and Spartan Analogies in Herodotos Representation, in: P.G. Bilde, J.M. Højte & V.F. Stolba (eds.), The Cauldron of Ariantas. Aarhus, 55-74.

Hinge, G. 2003b. Herodots skythiske nomader, in: T. Bekker-Nielsen & G. Hinge (eds.), På randen af det ukendte. Århus, 13-33.

Hinge, G. 2004a. Dialect colouring in quotations of Classical Greek poetry, in: G. Rocca (ed.), Dialetti, dialettismi, generi letterari e funzioni soxiali, Alessandria, 303-311.

Hinge, G. 2004b. Sjælevandring Skythien tur-retur, in: P.G. Bilde & J.M. Højte (eds.), Mennesker og guder ved Sortehavets kyster. Århus, 11-27.

Hommel, H. 1980. Der Gott Achilleus. Heidelberg.

Ivantchik, A.I. 1993. La datation du poeme l’Arimaspée d’Aristéas de Proconnèse, Ant.Class. 62, 35-67.

Jeanmaire, H. 1951. Dionysos. Histoire du culte de Bacchus. Paris.

Karttunen, K. India in Early Greek Literature. Helsinki 1989.

Lada-Richards, I. 1999. Initiating Dionysus. Ritual and Theatre in Aristophanes’ Frogs. Oxford.

Lévêque, P. 2000. Apollon et l’Orphisme à Olbia du Pont, in: M. Totorelli Ghidini, A. Storchi Marino & A. Visconti (eds.), Tra Orfeo e Pitagora. Napoli, 81-90.

Lincoln, B. 1981. Priests, Warriors, and Cattle. Berkeley and Los Angeles.

Linforth, I.M. 1918. Οἱ ἀθανατίζοντες, CPhil. 13, 23-33.

Lloyd, A.B. 1976. Herodotus. Book II. Vol. 1-3. Leiden, New York, København, Köln.

Lloyd-Jones, H. 1967. Heracles at Eleusis, Maia 19, 206-229.

Lloyd-Jones, H. 1985. Pindar and the Afterlife, in: A. Hurst (ed.), Pindare. Vandœuvres-Genève, 245-283.

Margreth, D. 1993. Skythische Schamanen? Die Nachrichten über Enarees-Anarieis bei Herodot und Hippokrates. Schaffhausen.

Merkelbach, R. 1988. Die Hirten des Dionysos. Stuttgart.

Merkelbach, R. 1999. Die goldenen Totenpässe: ägyptisch, orphisch, bakchisch, ZPE 128, 1-13

Mettinger, T.N.D. 2001. The Riddle of Resurrection. Stockholm.

Meuli, K. 1935. Scythica, Hermes 70, 121-176.

Murphy, E.M., & J.P. Mallory. 2000. Herodotus and the cannibals, Antiquity 74, 388-394.

Obbink, D. 1997. Cosmology as initiation, in: A. Laks & G.W. Most (eds.), Studies on the Derveni Papyrus. Oxford, 39-54.

Puccioni, G. 1970. Hercules Trikaranos nell’«Origo gentis Romanae», in: Mythos: scripta in honorem Marii Untersteiner. Genova, 235-239.

Pugliese Carratelli, G. 2001. Le lamine doro orfiche. Milano.

Rolle, R., M. Müller-Wille & K. Schietzel (eds.) 1991. Gold der Steppe. Neumünster.

Rosén, H.B. 1987. Herodoti Historiae. Vol. 1. Leipzig.

Rudenko, S.I. 1970. Frozen tombs of Siberia. London.

Rusjaeva, A.S. 1992. Religija i kul’ty antičnoj Ol’vii. Kiev.

Rusjaeva, A.S., & J.G. Vinogradov. 1991. Der „Brief des Priesters“ aus Hylaea, in: Rolle, Müller-Wille & Schietzel (eds.) 1991, 201-2.

Schmidt, V. 1975. Zu Euripides, Kyklops 120 und 707, Maia 27, 291-293.

Seaford, R. 1982. The Date of Euripides Cyclops, JHS 102, 161-172.

Seaford, R. 1984. Euripides. Cyclops. Oxford.

Shaw, B.D. 1982-83. “Eaters of flesh, drinkers of milk”: the ancient Mediterranean ideology of the pastoral nomad, Ancient Society 13-14, 5-32.

Struve, V.V. (ed.) 1965. Korpus bosporskich nadpisej. Corpus inscriptionum regni Bosporani. Moskva.

Sulimirski, V. 1985. The Scyths, in: I. Gershevitch (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge, vol. 2, 149-199.

Thordarson, F. 1988. The Scythian funeral customs, in: J. Duchesne-Guillemin & D. Marcotte (eds.), A Green Leaf: Papers in Honour of Professor Jes P. Asmussen. Leiden, 539-547.

Vernant, J.-P. 1979. Manger aux pays du soleil, in: Detienne & Vernant 1979, 239-249.

Vinogradov, J.G. 1997. Zur sachlichen und geschichtlichen Deutung der Orphiker-Plättchen von Olbia, in: Pontische Studien. Mainz, 242-249.

Watkins, C. 1995. How to Kill a Dragon. Oxford.

West, M.L. 1983. Orphic Poems. Oxford.

West, M.L. 1997. The East Face of Helicon. Oxford.

Wolf, G., & F.M. Andraschko. 1991. “... und heulen vor Lust“, in: Rolle, Müller-Wille & Schietzel 1991, 157-160.

Zhmud, L. 1997. Wissenschaft, Philosophie und Religion im frühen Pythagoreismus. Berlin.