On the Motion of Animals
. . .
Chapter 6
Now whether the soul is moved or not, and how it is moved if it be moved, has
been stated before in our treatise concerning it. And since all inorganic things
are moved by some other thing- and the manner of the movement of the first and
eternally moved, and how the first mover moves it, has been determined before in
our Metaphysics, it remains to inquire how the soul moves the body, and what is
the origin of movement in a living creature. For, if we except the movement of
the universe, things with life are the causes of the movement of all else, that
is of all that are not moved by one another by mutual impact. And so all their
motions have a term or limit, inasmuch as the movements of things with life have
such. For all living things both move and are moved with some object, so that
this is the term of all their movement, the end, that is, in view. Now we see
that the living creature is moved by intellect, imagination, purpose, wish, and
appetite. And all these are reducible to mind and desire. For both imagination
and sensation are on common ground with mind, since all three are faculties of
judgement though differing according to distinctions stated elsewhere. Will,
however, impulse, and appetite, are all three forms of desire, while purpose
belongs both to intellect and to desire. Therefore the object of desire or of
intellect first initiates movement, not, that is, every object of intellect,
only the end in the domain of conduct. Accordingly among goods that which moves
is a practical end, not the good in its whole extent. For it initiates movement
only so far as something else is for its sake, or so far as it is the object of
that which is for the sake of something else. And we must suppose that a seeming
good may take the room of actual good, and so may the pleasant, which is itself
a seeming good. From these considerations it is clear that in one regard that
which is eternally moved by the eternal mover is moved in the same way as every
living creature, in another regard differently, and so while it is moved
eternally, the movement of living creatures has a term. Now the eternal
beautiful, and the truly and primarily good (which is not at one time good, at
another time not good), is too divine and precious to be relative to anything
else. The prime mover then moves, itself being unmoved, whereas desire and its
faculty are moved and so move. But it is not necessary for the last in the chain
of things moved to move something else; wherefore it is plainly reasonable that
motion in place should be the last of what happens in the region of things
happening, since the living creature is moved and goes forward by reason of
desire or purpose, when some alteration has been set going on the occasion of
sensation or imagination.
Chapter 7
But how is it that thought (viz. sense, imagination, and thought proper) is
sometimes followed by action, sometimes not; sometimes by movement, sometimes
not? What happens seems parallel to the case of thinking and inferring about the
immovable objects of science. There the end is the truth seen (for, when one
conceives the two premises, one at once conceives and comprehends the
conclusion), but here the two premises result in a conclusion which is an
action- for example, one conceives that every man ought to walk, one is a man
oneself: straightway one walks; or that, in this case, no man should walk, one
is a man: straightway one remains at rest. And one so acts in the two cases
provided that there is nothing in the one case to compel or in the other to
prevent. Again, I ought to create a good, a house is good: straightway I make a
house. I need a covering, a coat is a covering: I need a coat. What I need I
ought to make, I need a coat: I make a coat. And the conclusion I must make a
coat is an action. And the action goes back to the beginning or first step. If
there is to be a coat, one must first have B, and if B then A, so one gets A to
begin with. Now that the action is the conclusion is clear. But the premisses of
action are of two kinds, of the good and of the possible.
And as in some cases of speculative inquiry we suppress one premise so here the
mind does not stop to consider at all an obvious minor premise; for example if
walking is good for man, one does not dwell upon the minor 'I am a man'. And so
what we do without reflection, we do quickly. For when a man actualizes himself
in relation to his object either by perceiving, or imagining or conceiving it,
what he desires he does at once. For the actualizing of desire is a substitute
for inquiry or reflection. I want to drink, says appetite; this is drink, says
sense or imagination or mind: straightway I drink. In this way living creatures
are impelled to move and to act, and desire is the last or immediate cause of
movement, and desire arises after perception or after imagination and
conception. And things that desire to act now create and now act under the
influence of appetite or impulse or of desire or wish.
The movements of animals may be compared with those of automatic puppets, which
are set going on the occasion of a tiny movement; the levers are released, and
strike the twisted strings against one another; or with the toy wagon. For the
child mounts on it and moves it straight forward, and then again it is moved in
a circle owing to its wheels being of unequal diameter (the smaller acts like a
centre on the same principle as the cylinders). Animals have parts of a similar
kind, their organs, the sinewy tendons to wit and the bones; the bones are like
the wooden levers in the automaton, and the iron; the tendons are like the
strings, for when these are tightened or leased movement begins. However, in the
automata and the toy wagon there is no change of quality, though if the inner
wheels became smaller and greater by turns there would be the same circular
movement set up. In an animal the same part has the power of becoming now larger
and now smaller, and changing its form, as the parts increase by warmth and
again contract by cold and change their quality. This change of quality is
caused by imaginations and sensations and by ideas. Sensations are obviously a
form of change of quality, and imagination and conception have the same effect
as the objects so imagined and conceived For in a measure the form conceived be
it of hot or cold or pleasant or fearful is like what the actual objects would
be, and so we shudder and are frightened at a mere idea. Now all these
affections involve changes of quality, and with those changes some parts of the
body enlarge, others grow smaller. And it is not hard to see that a small change
occurring at the centre makes great and numerous changes at the circumference,
just as by shifting the rudder a hair's breadth you get a wide deviation at the
prow. And further, when by reason of heat or cold or some kindred affection a
change is set up in the region of the heart, even in an imperceptibly small part
of the heart, it produces a vast difference in the periphery of the body,-
blushing, let us say, or turning white, goose-skin and shivers and their
opposites.